Category Archives: MOHE

Professor Dato’ Radin Umar’s reply 2

1:56:20
Tuesday
June 10 2008

lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran. Saya yakin Pengurusan USIM akan menanganinya secara adil________________________________

Professor Dato’ Radin UmarDirector GeneralDepartment of Higher EducationMinistry of Higher Education MalaysiaLevel 3, Block E9, Parcel E62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

My second email to Prof Dato’ Radin Umar

10 Jun 2008

Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.Diharap dapat menolong saya.

Professor Dato’ Radin Umar’s reply 1

12:53:48
Tuesday
June 10 2008

Assalamualaikum,Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan siasat dan membetulkan jika terdapat penyelewengan.Salam .________________________________
Professor Dato’ Radin Umar Director General
Department of Higher EducationMinistry of Higher Education MalaysiaLevel 3, Block E9, Parcel E62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

My first email to Prof Dato’ Radin Umar MOHE 10 June 2008

Askm Dato’

Saya (my real name), Pensyarah Di USIM. Saya telah dipaksa memanipulasi markah pelajar dan meluluskan pelajar kerana hanya dua pelajar lulus. Saya tidak mengubah markah kerana saya telah memberi markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan dan telah membuat kelas tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam sebelum peperiksaan untuk memperkasa pengetahuan pelajar.

Saya telah menerima surat daripada Dekan Fakulti Syariah & Undang2 menyatakan fakulti kecewa kerana saya enggan bekerjasama “memanipulasi markah” (my understanding, the exact wordings were “melihat/menyemak semula secara menyeluruh kaedah dan sistem penilaian yang dilakukan”.)

Dekan juga menuduh saya tidak efficient dalam pengajaran saya.

Dato’, saya mohon bantuan pihak Dato’ kerana saya dihukum kerana enggan memanipulasi markah pelajar agar ramai lulus kerana ianya tidak beretika. No telefon saya ialah (deleted).
Terima kasih.

I reported to MOHE about USIM in June 2008 -Letter to the Star

Dear Sir
With respect to the article and letter published by the Star namely “Out goes the lecturer” & “No compromise on excellence”, I thank the Star for highlighting my plight. The author of the letter “No compromise on excellence”, CHAN SIANG YEN, wrote “Will the Higher Education Ministry investigate this matter?”. For the record, I reported Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia’s (USIM) victimization towards me to the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) in June 2008. I also reported to the MOHE in September 2008 that I had reached the end of my tether as my USIM superiors continued victimizing me.

In November 2008 (five/5 months after I reported my victimization to the MOHE), I was “forced to resign due to USIM’s continuous victimization” and also out of frustration as I received no official response from the MOHE regarding USIM’s victimization, despite the fact that I wrote to the MOHE, ten (10) times before I resigned.

I retracted my resignation letter as USIM had not punished my superiors who victimized me but USIM refused to accept my retraction.

I only got an official reply from the MOHE in February 2009, nearly EIGHT (8) MONTHS after I lodged my complaint against USIM. The MOHE’s reply is the following:
“2. Sebagaimana Puan sedia maklum, Jabatan ini telah menerima aduan Puan mengenai isu Puan dituduh tidak efisyen kerana enggan bekerjasama dalam menilai semula markah pelajar yang mengikuti kelas Puan pada 15 Jun 2008. Jabatan ini melalui suratnya kepada Naib Canselor Universiti Islam Sains Malaysia (USIM) rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 bertarikh 27 Jun 2008 telahpun melakukan siasatan ke atas isu seperti tersebut di atas dan mendapati bahawa Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula.
3. Jabatan ini sekali lagi menerima aduan dari Puan pada 3 Disember 2008 mengenai isu ketidakadilan yang berlaku terhadap Puan sehingga mendorong Puan meletakkan jawatan selaku Pensyarah Universiti Gred DS45 berkuatkuasa mulai 18 Disember 2008 melalui surat Puan kepada Pengurusan USIM bertarikh 17 November 2008. Jabatan ini telah sekali lagi meminta laporan maklum balas Pengurusan Tertinggi USIM mengenai perkara ini melalui percakapan lisan antara saya dan Tuan Addenan bin Hj Abdul Rahman, Pendaftar USIM. Jabatan ini telah meneliti laporan tersebut dan mendapati perkara-perkara berikut:
a) Urusan permohonan perletakan jawatan Puan
adalah mengikut prosedur yang telah ditetapkan
oleh USIM.
b) USIM berhak untuk menerima atau menolak
permohonan perletakan jawatan Puan; dan
c) USIM mempunyai kuasa autonomi dalam hal ehwal
pengurusan dan pentadbiran akademik Universiti.

4. Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”

I wish to highlight here that the MOHE took nearly EIGHT (8) MONTHS (June 2008 to February 2009) to reply to my written complaints, regardless of the fact that I had informed the MOHE in June 2008 and September 2008 of USIM’s continuous victimization. Please note that on 19th June 2008, I lodged a complaint to the MOHE regarding the verbal abuse by USIM’s Timbalan Naib Canselor (Akademik) Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda.

I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, Timbalan Naib Canselor (Akademik) on 19th June 2008 regarding Prof Dr Hj Abdul Samat Musa, Dean of USIM’s Syariah & Law’s Faculty’s victimization towards me.

In the meeting, Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda shouted at me and said the following to me:
1. You are a failure. Your effort goes down the drain
because your students fail . The government can spend
a lot of money training but it’s no use if the students fail.
(I explained to him before he made the remark, that I
spent 6 to eight hours (free of charge) giving them extra
classes due to their poor performance in the mid
semester examination . I also spent 2 to 3 hours per
week (free of charge) for ten weeks teaching English to
my students in order to enhance their vocabulary).
2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the
wrong place. Our university rates our students based on
their development. We are unlike professional bodies
like Accounting professional bodies which grade their
students based on their performance in professional
exams. (Before he made his remark, I explained to him
that I graded the exam papers based on the merit and
cogency of the answers given as well as based on the
marking scheme).
3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue an
official letter that he wants me to quit teaching as he said
that I am not suitable for the university).
4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority
of them failed?
5. How come your students distorted what you taught?
6. Are you telling me that 153 students (those who failed
my courses) do not understand what you taught? There
must be something wrong with your teaching!
7. What do you think of our students? You look down
at our students!
8. Why are you so vindictive?

Please note that the meeting was the first time I met Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda and yet he accused me of being vindictive.

I reported Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda’s verbal abuse to USIM & its Senate in June 2008. USIM never took any action against Prof Dr Hj Abdul Samat Musa’s & Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda’s victimisation towards me, until today.

Based on the fact that the MOHE took nearly EIGHT (8) MONTHS to give its official respond to my complaint, I am of the view that the MOHE is incompetent, inefficient, lacked the urgency to help me and not interested to render justice to me .

I find the MOHE’s decision that the Senate of USIM has the authority to review the marks to be MOHE’s approval of USIM’s action altering low marks awarded to its UNDERGRADUATES regardless of the “poor quality” of the answers given. Please find attached samples of the questions posed and answers given and be the judge of the quality.

I also find that the MOHE’s decision, that USIM has full autonomy, reflects the MOHE’s failure to understand the World Bank’s Report on Malaysia “Malaysia and the Knowledge Economy: Building a World-Class Higher Education System” (which MOHE helped to prepare) which states, “Increasing autonomy of public universities and expecting full accountability in return” which means that “Autonomy of public universities in Malaysia is not absolute as such universities are expected to be fully accountable in their decision-making.” USIM must be accountable for all its actions forcing lecturers to manipulate marks to get higher ratings and its victimization towards me.

USIM cannot accept the fact that my students are weak and have poor command of the English language. I asked Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda on 19th June 2008 why are the courses taught in English as the undergraduates who learnt English since they were in Standard One, are not proficient in English? He answered, “You have NO RIGHT to ask the question!” I said to him, “What do you expect me to do, lower my standards?”

USIM in Harian Metro 17th April 2009 accused me as “berniat jahat” (having bad intention/being malicious). I reported to Kosmo regarding USIM’s victimization towards me for refusing to manipulate marks, as Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) uses the name Islam but desecrated, corrupted and defiled Islam with its unethical practice of manipulating marks. USIM also victimized me although I strive to be an upright (Takwa) Muslim. USIM higher officials signed their letters to me under the slogan “BERILMU, BERDISIPLIN DAN BERTAKWA”. BERTAKWA means being “god-fearing, righteous & upright”. I find USIM higher officials who victimized me and manipulated marks to be “tidak BERTAKWA”.

Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia should not mislead the public with its unethical practices that desecrate and defile Islam. It must carry the name Islam with Takwa!

The Ministry of Higher Education as the custodian of Higher Education in Malaysia must not protect and cover up USIM’s unethical practices. It must be honest!!!!!

Please be informed.

Sincerely
Nor

Question A
Give four (4) instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(4 marks)

Answer scheme
When the eddah period has expired
(1 mark)
Talaq through fasakh
(1 mark)
Talaq pronounced before the consummation of the marriage
(1 mark)
Talaq through khulu’.
(1 mark)

Sample answer 1 Question A
4 instances of Talaq Bain Sughra.
The husband pronounce the wife not get the consummet from the husband, the wife not the period iddah after the divorce.
The husband divorce the wife time period the wife must After 3x suci from it For the husband ruju’.
The wife in the hamil must born the baby for the husband ruju’ him.
Marks earned: 0.1 out of 4 marks

Question A
Give four (4) instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(4 marks)

Answer scheme
When the eddah period has expired
(1 mark)
Talaq through fasakh
(1 mark)
Talaq pronounced before the consummation of the marriage
(1 mark)
Talaq through khulu’.
(1 mark)
Give four (4) instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(4 marks)

Sample answer 2 Question A
Talaq Ba’in Sughra is the husband pronounced the divorce or talaq one or two times before consumption of the marriage or sex. Four instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra are if the man or husband want to married ex-wife, the marriage must have a new marriage ceremony and new akad nikah without waited the ‘iddah. The woman cannot married another man and divorce and after iddah marriage the ex-husband.
Marks earned: 0.7 out of 4 marks

Question A
Give four (4) instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(4 marks)

Answer scheme
When the eddah period has expired
(1 mark)
Talaq through fasakh
(1 mark)
Talaq pronounced before the consummation of the marriage
(1 mark)
Talaq through khulu’.
(1 mark)

Sample answer 3 Question A
Talaq Ba’in Sughra is a talaq whereby the talaq that severed immediately on the pronouncement of talaq and has no period of eddah.

The four instances are:
1) Talaq by fasakh
Talaq by fasakh will be effected if;
(1) where the wife the whereabouts of the husband of more than one year.
(2) The husband has neglected or failed to give maintenance to his wife.
and etc. as stated in section 52 of IFLA 1984.
(2) Talaq by Khul’, ‘cerai tebus talaq’.
(3) Where the talaq or divorce irretrievably broken down and both spouses cant be reconcilled.
(4) Where the husband made pronouncement of three talaqs and that he cannot remarry her except if she marries the other man and having consummation/ sexual intercourse between that man.
2 marks out of 4 marks

Question A
Give four (4) instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(4 marks)

Answer scheme
When the eddah period has expired
(2 mark)
Talaq through fasakh
(1 mark)
Talaq pronounced before the consummation of the marriage
(1 mark)
Talaq through khulu’.
(1 mark)
Give four (4) instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(4 marks)

Sample answer 4 Question A
Talaq Bain Sughra is a dissolution of marriage by parties after they consumption and must make a new ceremony of marriage and new mas kahwin when want to return to original marriage state or to revocable after period of iddah. For instances of Talaq Bain Sughra is Khul, Fasakh, Ta’liq and divorced by one or two talaq.
1.9 out of 4 marks

Question B
What are the consequences of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(6 marks)

Answer scheme
Dissolves a marriage instantly
(1 mark)
at the time of pronouncement.
(1 mark)
The rights of the wife cease as soon as the talaq is pronounced.
(1 mark)
If the ex-husband wishes to resume marital relationship with his ex-wife,
(1 mark)
he has to undergo a new marriage ceremony with her
(1 mark)
with a new mas kahwin.
(1 mark)

Sample answer 1 Question B

Talaq ba’in sughra is an irrevocable divorce. In the other words, a spouses cannot revoked the talaq pronounced by ruju’.

However, if they are intent to return back to each other. They need to come with a new mahr and new aqd.

A rights of wife is ceased immediately after the pronouncement of talaq. However, she is still entitled for a mutaah, share in harta sepencarian etc. 2.4 out of 6 marks

Question B
What are the consequences of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(6 marks)
Answer scheme
Dissolves a marriage instantly
(1 mark)
at the time of pronouncement.
(1 mark)
The rights of the wife cease as soon as the talaq is pronounced.
(1 mark)
If the ex-husband wishes to resume marital relationship with his ex-wife,
(1 mark)
he has to undergo a new marriage ceremony with her
(1 mark)
with a new mas kahwin.
(1 mark)

Sample answer 2 Question B
1. The husband can ruju with the wife because not talaq three the husband must marriage ceremony.
2. The wife diverce on the time prenenet baby must the born baby, the husband can ruju,with the wife.
3. The husband diverce the wife not consummeted not iddah,
4. The husband diverce the wife in the time period women must the wife 3 suci for the husband ruju.
0.1 out of 6 marks

Question B
What are the consequences of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.
(6 marks)

Answer scheme
Dissolves a marriage instantly
(1 mark)
at the time of pronouncement.
(1 mark)
The rights of the wife cease as soon as the talaq is pronounced.
(1 mark)
If the ex-husband wishes to resume marital relationship with his ex-wife,
(1 mark)
he has to undergo a new marriage ceremony with her
(1 mark)
with a new mas kahwin.
(1 mark)

Sample answer 3 Question B
The consequences of talaq Ba’in Sughra are where the husband does not agree to voluntarily pronounce a talaq, but the parties agree to a divorce by redemption or cerai tebus talaq, the Court shall, after the amount of the payment of tebus talaq is agreed upon by the parties, cause the husband to pronounce a divorce by redemption.

Talaq Ba’in Sughra is three talak, but when the husband want to return him wife, he must view marriage. And did not to wait the wife to marriage another man.
O out of 6 marks.

Nor refutes MQA’s claim that it does not know her identity

Dear Readers

I refute MQA’s claim in theSun at page 6 being reported on Tuesday April 21 2009 that it does not know my identity in an article “Probe into lecturer’s ’sympathy marks’ case”. I complained about Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia’s (USIM) unethical practice forcing me to manipulate marks to Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif of Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein on the 10th of June 2008 (10/6/2008). Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein called me and informed me that MQA can only investigate allegedly “unethical Public Universities” in January 2009.

This year, I sent an email to Ketua Pengarah Biro Pengaduan Awam Dr Tam Weng Wah regarding USIM’s unethical practice forcing me to manipulate marks whereby I explained to him that I gave extra classes to the students after they performed badly in the mid semester exam. Then Dr Tam forwarded my email to En Mohd Asri bin Mohamad (mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my) on Wednesday March 4 2009 at 7:55:39pm which states the following:
“KPP (A4), Disertakan maklumat tambahan untuk tindakan susulan. Sekian, terima kasih. KP” This email by Dr Tam was being cced (cc) to the aforementioned Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif MQA, Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein at syedahmad@mqa.gov.my.

Then on Thursday March 5 2009 at 1:01:05 PM En Mohd Asri bin Mohamad (mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my) sent an email to the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) which reads the following:
“Tuan, Dikemukakan bersama-sama ini email aduan daripada pengadu untuk mendapat makluman dan tindakan pihak tuan jua. Dipohon maklum balas daripada pihak tuan dikemukakan terus kepada pengadu dan sesalinan dipanjangkan kepada BPA untuk tujuan rekod.Di atas kerjasama dan tindakan segera di pihak tuan amatlah dihargai. Sekian, terima kasih.” This email by En Mohd Asri bin Mohamad was also being cced (cc) to the aforementioned Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif MQA, Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein at syedahmad@mqa.gov.my.

Based on the abovementioned explanation, I hereby rebut MQA’s spokesman Muhammad Muammar Gaddafi’s claim in theSun which reads “..we do not know who the teacher is”.

Please be informed. Thank You.

Sincerely,
Nor

Did the Cabinet decide on undergrad politics? Rockybru

http://rockybru.com.my/2010/08/did-cabinet-decide-on-undgrad-politics.html

Did the Cabinet decide on undergrad politics?

UPDATED, 5.45pm 12/8 Aah, the Cabinet did discuss undergrads’ involvement in politics yesterday, and it was very clear that while undergrads may take active part in politics (which is already provided for under the Act), they should not hold any position in a political party. Original article:- NOTE TO EDITORS: AUGUST 11, 2010 [received 6:54:20pm yesterday] The Office of the Higher Education Minister has requested the media not to publish the news about Cabinet prohibiting undergraduates from involvement in politics.

The news that Bernama sent out earlier yesterday:-

CABINET PROHIBITS UNDERGRADUATES FROM INVOLVEMENT IN POLITICS

Putrajaya, Aug 11 (Bernama) – The Cabinet today decided not to allow undergraduates to be involved in political parties, said Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin. However, he said the decision did not prevent the undergraduates from keeping abreast with political developments in the country. “This is because Section 15 of the Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA) 1971 is sufficient where an undergraduate can be involved in political activities after obtaining permission from the Vice-Chancellor,” he said in a statement to Bernama, here today. Yesterday, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said the government would uphold the restriction on students of public institutions of higher learning to be involved in politics despite the call to allow university students to be involved actively in political parties. Muhyiddin said the amendments to the UUCA earlier were sufficient as it gave more freedom to undergraduates to voice their opinions in campus. – BERNAMA

So what’s the story, Khaled? Did the Cabinet make that decision, or not? If it did, why was the media not allowed to carry the news? And did you know that Khairy Jamaluddin, the Umno Youth chief, had already shot his response to the Cabinet decision to Malaysiakini, which reads like this: 11/8: Khairy Jamaludddin describes the cabinet decision not to allow student involvement in party politics as ‘gutless’ and ‘outdated’./MKINI at 1:25 PM

V-C: Explain criteria for education rating system By EMBUN MAJID embun@thestar.com.my

Thursday July 22, 2010

V-C: Explain criteria for education rating system By EMBUN MAJID embun@thestar.com.my

ALOR SETAR: Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) vice-chancellor Prof Dr Mohamed Mustafa Ishak wants the Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) to explain the criteria for the Rating System for Malaysian Higher Education 2009 (Setara). “The MQA should give a clearer picture on how the rating is made because it is unfair that public and private universities are lumped together as they are ‘different’. “Private universities are profit-oriented while public universities aim to provide education for all,” he said after hosting a dinner with the media here on Tuesday. Dr Mohamed Mustafa said grouping the two under one category also gave a negative perception to well-established public universities, as they are compared with newer private universities, some of which might have been operating for a few months only. In the Setara rating announced by Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin last week, UUM was in Tier Four with 24 other institutions – 14 private and 10 public – classified as “Very Good”. The rating, which involved 58 universities and university colleges nationwide, is conducted every two years and evaluates teaching and learning quality. Dr Mohamed Mustafa said that according to MQA, UUM’s rating had dropped, but the university felt that this was not correct. “We have more than 30,000 students, including some 3,000 foreigners from 42 countries. “We also have twinning programmes with foreign universities,” he added.

Pensyarah perubatan merayu-Utusan Malaysia-12 Julai 2010

ARKIB : 12/07/2010

<!–         –>

Pensyarah perubatan merayu

PADA 24 Mac lalu, Utusan Malaysia telah melaporkan Menteri Pengajian Tinggi Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin mengumumkan kenaikan gaji untuk para pensyarah perubatan.

Beliau berkata, ”ia akan membolehkan golongan pensyarah tersebut memperoleh gaji yang setara dengan pegawai perubatan yang berkhidmat di Kementerian Kesihatan” dan Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi mempunyai skim pensyarah yang berbeza misalnya dalam bidang-bidang yang kritikal.

”Ketika ini, gaji pensyarah dalam bidang perubatan dan pergigian adalah rendah, jadi yang itu kita akan naikkan dulu,” katanya pada sidang akhbar selepas merasmikan Seminar Meningkatkan Keberkesanan Peranan Lembaga Pengarah Universiti (LPU).

Pada masa itu kami dimaklumkan kenaikan akan bermula pada Julai 2010. Ya betul seperti yang dijanji, gaji kami naik. Saya menikmati kenaikan sebanyak RM2.10. Ya, dua ringgit dan sepuluh sen sahaja. Ini adalah kerana jadual gaji matriks bagi gred DU51-54 yang dinaikkan.

Apabila ditukar ke skim gaji baru, kami akan bermula pada tangga gaji yang lebih tinggi dari gaji sebelumnya walaupun turun gred. Dalam kes saya, saya diturunkan dari P1TS ke P1T3. Inilah kenaikan yang dijanjikan.

Tugas seorang pensyarah perubatan adalah pelbagai. Kami mempunyai pesakit seperti doktor-doktor lain. Jadi kami mempunyai wad, klinik dan menjalankan prosedur-prosedur atau pembedahan. Di samping itu, kami mempunyai tugas akademik iaitu mengajar pelajar-pelajar perubatan dan bakal pakar perubatan.

Ini melibatkan siri syarahan, tutorial, pengajaran di dalam wad, pemeriksa peperiksaan dan lain-lain.

Sebagai staf akademik universiti, kami juga dipaksa untuk membuat penyelidikan dan menghasilkan penerbitan di dalam jurnal terkemuka.

Ini merupakan KPI kami setiap tahun. Selalunya KPI kami akan ‘tersangkut’ di bahagian penerbitan ini. Bilakah masa untuk kami membuat penyelidikan dan menulis dan lebih menyedihkan kami tidakpun mempunyai bilik seperti pensyarah lain untuk duduk dan menulis.

Jika kami gagal menghasilkan dua penerbitan setiap tahun (bagi pensyarah kanan), ia akan menjejaskan peluang naik pangkat kami kerana kami tidak memenuhi KPI.

Akhirnya seorang pensyarah perubatan yang sibuk dengan tugas klinikal ini akan kecewa, dan akibatnya universiti kehilangan individu-individu yang berkualiti ini ke hospital swasta.

Agak pelik layanan terhadap pensyarah perubatan sebegini kerana kamilah yang melatih doktor-doktor dan pakar-pakar perubatan yang berkhidmat di hospital-hospital di seluruh negara.

Saya berpendapat puncanya ialah kami tiada seorang ‘bapa’ yang memperjuangkan nasib kami di peringkat atasan. Ini jelas berbeza dengan doktor-doktor di Kementerian Kesihatan yang mempunyai ketua pengarah yang jauh lebih baik baru-baru ini.

Saya bagi pihak pensyarah perubatan di seluruh Malaysia merayu agar pihak berkenaan mengkaji perkara ini dengan serius atau universiti akan terus kehilangan doktor pakar yang berkualiti ke Kementerian Kesihatan atau sektor swasta.

Ini sudah tentu akan menjejaskan latihan bakal doktor dan pakar perubatan dan seterusnya kualiti mutu khidmat kesihatan di seluruh negara.

DR. ZUL HILMI YAAKOB,

Pensyarah Kanan Unit Kardiologi,

Jabatan Perubatan Fakulti Perubatan

Universiti Malaya.

Datuk Yusuf Kasim DG of Public Universities, MOHE

I was informed by a Professor before I saw Datuk Yusuf Kasim, DG of Public Universities, MOHE ,that I should not expect much from him as  Datuk Yusuf Kasim is an opportunist, he will only help those who will benefit him as well. The Professor was right! He provoked me on my first meeting. So the moral of the story is, there is a top-ranked civil servant who is an opportunist, who will not defend  the down-trodden.

Lesson I learnt from USIM,MOHE, BPA

Integrity is just mere lip service, a wishful thinking & the powers that be (those in power) at USIM, BPA/PCB  & MOHE are devoid of integrity.

Akujanji kakitangan kerajaan untuk berlaku jujur ibarat omong kosong, mereka hanya bermulut manis, jikalau anda mengharap mereka berlaku jujur, jauh panggang dari api sama sekali, anda akan menggigit jari, oleh yang demikian anda mempunyai tiga pilihan:

1. Memilih untuk menggigit jari siapa, jari anda sendiri, atau jari orang lain yang memberi izin buat anda menggigit jarinya/mereka……pastikan mereka itu muhrim anda ye…..

2.  Menyediakan plaster sebelum anda menggigit jari kerana anda mungkin melukakan jari yang anda pilih untuk gigit…

3. Melakukan Istikharah untuk mengetahui apakah langkah yang anda perlu ambil.

Pilihan ketiga adalah pilihan yang munasib/afdhal tetapi jikalau ada orang izinkan anda menggigit jarinya atau jari mereka, gigitlah sekadar sahaja, jangan putuskan harapan rakan anda yang sukarela mengizinkan anda menggigit jarinya/mereka. 

Hikmah ketidakjujuran tonggak USIM, BPA/PCB  & MOHE, anda dapat mengenal pasti rakan anda/saudara mara yang sanggup mengizinkan anda menggigit jarinya/mereka. Anda memperolehi seseorang yang sanggup mengorbankan jarinya/mereka buat anda, oleh itu jangan gigit sampai putus tau, gurau aje…..

JOHAN SETIA MAHKOTA (J.S.M.): Y. Brs. Prof. Dr. Rujhan Mustafa

JOHAN SETIA MAHKOTA (J.S.M.)

Blawan Embayau, Misri Barham, Aminah A.fF. Musally, Ngoo Kong Hua @ Ngoo Kong Hee, Y. Bhg. Dato’ Mustaffa Haji Saman, Yeoh Gim Bee, Y. Brs. Prof. Dr. Mohd. Fauzi Hj. Ramlan, Y.A.A. Tuan Haji Mohamad Haji Abdullah, Y. Brs. Prof. Dr. Rujhan Mustafa, Y. Bhg. Dato’ Mohd Jamidan Abdullah, Y. Bhg. Datin Noriah Hashim, HajiYussoff Dohab, Zainal Abidin Arshad, Alwi Haji Ibrahim, Y. Bhg. Dato’ Tarmedi Hj. Omar, Alainal Hasani Md. Noor, Haji Abd Rashid Ngah, Raslin Abu Bakar, Y. Bhg. Datuk Maznah Hj. Abdul Ghani, Y. Bhg. Datuk Godfrey Gregory Joitol, Y. Bhg. Datuk Sam Mannan @ Sham, Abdullah Kassim, Haji Dr. Ismail Haji Ahmad, Razak Drahman, Lim Kim Hoe, Y. Bhg. Datuk Wira Hj. Rashid Redza Hj. Md. Saleh, Hithaya Jeevan Narayanasamy, Yap Kok Seng, Chin Phaik Yoong, Hawazain Shaari, Dr. Hajah Che Fatimah Haji Awang, Jamilah Baharom, Lee Han Lim, Patricia Yoon Moi, Y. Bhg. Datin Asariah Mior Shaharuddin, Che Ab. Rahim Haji Nik, Borhan Sidik, Mariam Mas Yaacob, Y. Bhg. Datuk Chua Kim Hing @ Kim Hing b. Ah Fong, Mohd Arpan Shari, Nik Aziz Hj. Nik Hussain, Y. Brs. Dr. Mohd Akbar Md. Said, Y. Brs. Dr. Soh Chee Seng, Haji Idris Ismail, Y. Brs. Prof. Dr. Jailani Md. Yunos, Y. Brs. Dr. Zaidun Kamari, Y. Brs. Prof. Ir. Dr. Siti Hamisah Tapsir, Y. Brs. Prof. Dr. Normah Mohd Noor, Y. Brs. Prof. Dr. Osman Ali, Mohd Mahyidin Mohd Mustakim, Zakaria A. Samad, Y. Bhg. Datin Noor Izzah Mansor, Y. Bhg. Dato’ Teo Chiang Kok, Gurdial Singh Kartar Singh, Y. Brs. Dr. Chua Wan Tiong, Haji Jamaluddin Mohd Isa, Syed Ahmad Nazri Syed Kamaruzaman, Haji Abdul Shukor Mohsin, Haji Markum Haji Ghazali, Laksamana Pertama Nasaruddin Othman, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’ Haji Mohd Affendy Abdullah, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’ Jeyabalan C. Sinnadurai, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’ Dr. William Rangit Stevenson, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’ Mohamed Batcha, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’Ir. Abdul Nasser Ahmad, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’ Pahlawan Mohd Razif Haji Idris, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’ Khamsan Ngari, Y. Bhg. Laksamana Dato’ Pahlawan Amzah Sulaiman, Laksamana Pertama Khairuddin Khalid, Y. Bhg. Laksamana Pertama Datuk Yahya Hashim, Y. Bhg. Laksamana Pertama Dato’ Mohd Noh Lebai Mahat, Y. Bhg. Jen. Dato’ Khairul Bakri Mustaffa, Y. Bhg. Jen. Dato’ Sukur Haminudin, Y. Bhg. Brig. Jen. Dato’ Ackbal Haji Abdul Samad, Y. Bhg. Jen. Dato’ Mohd Sulong, SAC I Shabudin Abdul Wahab, Y. Bhg. SAC I Dato’ Osman Haji Salleh, Y. Bhg. SAC I Dato’ Zamri Yahya, SAC II Haji Zakaria Haji Yusof, SAC II Tan Kok Liang, SAC II Dr. Hashim Haron, Yong Vui Seng, Lam Tiang Chong, Y. Bhg. Datuk Howard Bahat @ Alex Martin, Timbon @ Herbert Lagadan, Y. Bhg. Dato’ Mohd Hadzir Hj. Ismail, YB Dato’ Mohd Shamsudin Lias, YB Mohd Tajudin Abdullah, Ong Chong Swen, William Liaw Wah Fong.

Since “The mail system : unknown user:myk, I emailed to radinumx@mohe.gov.my to get my much delayed “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT”

— On Fri, 5/22/09, I wrote:

From: me
Subject: Fw: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Cc: tam@pcb.gov.my, mohdasri@pcb.gov.my, ppm@pmo.gov.my, sidek@pmo.gov.my, minister@mohe.gov.my
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 7:45 AM

Prof Dato Dr Radin Umar

 

Saya telah menghantar email dibawah kepada Timbalan Pengarah Tuan berkenaan dengan kemungkiran janji beliau untuk menghantar kepada saya “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT”.Walau bagaimanapun email tersebut tidak dihantar ke alamat myk@mohe.gov.my

dan MAILER-DAEMON@mohe.gov.my menyatakan seperti berikut:

 

“This is the mail system at host email.mohe.gov.my.

I’m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It’s attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message.

                   The mail system

<myk@mohe.gov.my>: unknown user: “myk”

 

 

Sebagaimana Tuan maklum Dr Tam dari BPA telahpun menerima “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT” TETAPI SAYA MASIH LAGI BELUM MENERIMA DARIPADA TUAN “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT”.

 

SAYA MEMOHON TUAN MENGHANTAR “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT” PADA HARI INI JUMAAT, 22 MEI 2009 KERANA Timbalan Pengarah TUAN SENGAJA MEMUNGKIRI JANJI UNTUK  MENGHANTAR DOKUMEN TERSEBUT KEPADA SAYA.

 

HARAP MAKLUM. TERIMA KASIH.

 

Yang benar

my name

 

End of email.

 

Dato Yusof Kasim,

 

Merujuk kepada email Dato bertarikh 6 Mac 2009 kepada Dr Tam KP BPA (sesalinan dihantar kepada saya) dimana Dato berjanji untuk menghantar “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT”.

 

Dr Tam telahpun menerima “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT” TETAPI SAYA MASIH LAGI BELUM MENERIMA DARIPADA TUAN “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT”.

 

SAYA MEMOHON TUAN MENGHANTAR “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT” PADA HARI INI JUMAAT, 21 MEI 2009 KERANA TUAN SENGAJA MEMUNGKIRI JANJI UNTUK  MENGHANTAR DOKUMEN TERSEBUT KEPADA SAYA.

 

HARAP MAKLUM. TERIMA KASIH.

Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender : unknown user: “myk”

— On Fri, 5/22/09, Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To:
me
Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 6:51 AM

This is the mail system at host email.mohe.gov.my.

I’m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It’s attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

                   The mail system

<myk@mohe.gov.my>: unknown user: “myk”

Email to myk@mohe.gov.my who promised Dr Tam of BPA to provide to me the chronology of MOHE’s actions but did not fulfill the promise. MYK gave the chronology to Dr Tam who made a finding/decided in BPA’s favour.

— On Fri, 5/22/09,I wrote:

From: MYSELF

Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

To: myk@mohe.gov.my

Cc: ppm@pmo.gov.my, sidek@pmo.gov.my, tam@bpa.jpm.my, “Mohd Asri bin Mohamed” , “Aziz bin Ismail” , minister@mohe.gov.my, radinumx@mohe.gov.my

Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 6:48 AM

Dato Yusof Kasim,

Merujuk kepada email Dato bertarikh 6 Mac 2009 kepada Dr Tam KP BPA (sesalinan dihantar kepada saya) dimana Dato berjanji untuk menghantar “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT”. Dr Tam telahpun menerima “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT” TETAPI SAYA MASIH LAGI BELUM MENERIMA DARIPADA TUAN “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT”. SAYA MEMOHON TUAN MENGHANTAR “kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT” PADA HARI INI JUMAAT, 21 MEI 2009 KERANA TUAN SENGAJA MEMUNGKIRI JANJI UNTUK MENGHANTAR DOKUMEN TERSEBUT KEPADA SAYA. HARAP MAKLUM. TERIMA KASIH. > ________________________________ > > From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my [mailto:radinumx@mohe.gov.my] >

Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23 >

To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed; myk@mohe.gov.my >

Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; > pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; > mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail >

Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak > efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah > > > >

Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan > tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT. > > > > Terima kasih. > —–

 Forwarded Message —-

From: myk@mohe.gov.my

To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah

Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed ; myk@mohe.gov.my; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa ; Aziz bin Ismail ; Myself

Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 12:40:46 PM

Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

Dr. Tam,

Terima kasih. Akan kami uruskan saperti yang dicadangkan.

Yusof Kasim.

06 Mac 2009. >

Y.Bhg. Prof. Dato’. > >

Terima kasih. Kerjasama dipohon sesalinan jawapan dihantar kepada pengadu > juga. > > (Dr. Tam)

> 06 Mac 2009 > > ________________________________ > > From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my [mailto:radinumx@mohe.gov.my] >

Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23 >

To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed; myk@mohe.gov.my >

Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; > pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; > mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail >

Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak > efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah > > > >

Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan > tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT. > > > > Terima kasih. > > > > > > ___________________________ > > Professor Dato’ Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc > Director General > >

Department of Higher Education Malaysia > > Block E9, Parcel E, 62505 Putrajaya > > Malaysia > > > >

From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah [mailto:tam@bpa.jpm.my] >

Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM >

To: Mohd Asri bin Mohamed >

Cc: myself; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; > radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; > nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; > tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail >

Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak > efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah > > > >

KPP (A4), > > > >

Harap dapat kerjasama KPT untuk memberi maklum balas terus kepada pengadu > terhadap perkara ini. > > > >

Sekian, terima kasih. > > > >

KP > > > > ________________________________ > > From: me [mailto:me

Date: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59 >

To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah >

Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my; > myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; > dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List >

Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak > efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah > >

Dr Tam Weng Wah > >

KETUA PENGARAH > >

BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM, > > > >

Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada  KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran tetapi belum letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.  Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali Ketua Program SMSU, Tarikh 28th August 2008 > Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings.. > > > >

Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > > Dekan FSU > > > > Tarikh 28th August 2008 > > > > > > Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student > > > >Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda > > Timbalan Naib Canselor > > USIM > > Tarikh 28th August 2008 > > > > Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM > > > > > > > >

Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd > Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk > “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” > tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA > Ketua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut ( > yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini). > > > >

Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: > > > > “Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan > juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah > laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.” > >

Tuan Dr Tam, > > > >

Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada: > > > >

1. Tidak diambil kira, atau. >

2. Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh > pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM > MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA > KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI > 2009) atau.. >

3. Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau > tidak, atau. 4. Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalu > mereka-reka cerita, atau >

5. Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah. >

6. Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM > MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap. > > > >

Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih. > > > >

—– Forwarded Message —- >

From: me > >

To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my >

Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM >Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak > efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah > >

Assalamualaikum Dato > > > >

Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest > development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the > letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the > view that my superiors are acting without impunity. > >

Thank you. > > —

On Tue, 6/24/08, radinumx@mohe.gov.my wrote: > >

From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my >

Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak > efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah >

To: me >

Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 4:50 PM > >

Im in australia. Have asked prof rujhan to look into it > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device via Vodafone-Celcom Mobile. > > ________________________________ > > From: me >

Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT) > To: >

Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak > efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah > > > > —

On Thu, 6/19/08, I wrote: > >

From: me >

Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient > kerana enggan manipulasi markah >

To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my >

Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 2:56 PM > > >

Assalamualaikum Dato > > > >

I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, TNC (Academic) today at 12.30 > pm. He shouted at me and said the following to me: > > 1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your students > fail . The government can spend a lot of money training but it’s no use if > the students fail. > >

2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the wrong place. > Our university rates our students based on their development.(Before he > made his remark, I explained to him that I grade the exam papers based on > the merit and cogency of the answer based on the marking scheme). > >

3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter that he > wants me to quit teaching as I am not suitable for the university)

4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority of them > failed? > >

5. What do you think of our students?You look down at our students! > > > >

Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM for justice, as the > TNC(Academic) himself had asked me to leave the university. >

Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as I did not do anything > wrong. I marked the papers based on merit and cogency. I am truly victimised here and the insults and demand to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda today is truly an affront to me and the straw that breaks the camel’s back. > > > >

Please Dato, I ask for justice. > > > >

Yours sincerely

my Name> > > > > —

On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar > wrote: > >

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar > Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah >

To: “me” >

Cc: “mrujhan” >

Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM > >

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah. > ________________________________ Professor Dato’ Radin Umar

Director > General

Department of Higher Education

Ministry of Higher Education > Malaysia

Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA >

Dato’ > > Sy mohon bantuan Dato’ kerana sy baru 6 bulan bekerja di sini dan sy > > memang tidak diperlakukan dengan adil meskipun saya berkata benar. > > Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato’. > >

Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar > wrote: > > lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran. Saya > yakin Pengurusan USIM akan > menanganinya secara adil > > ________________________________ > Professor Dato’ Radin Umar > Director General > Department of Higher Education > Ministry of Higher Education > Malaysia > Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E > 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA > >>

> Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.Diharap dapat menolong >> > saya. >> >>

Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote: >> Assalamualaikum, > >> >> Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan siasat dan membetulkan > jika >> terdapat penyelewengan. >> >> Salam. >> >> > ________________________________ >> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar >> > Director General >> Department of Higher Education >> Ministry of Higher > Education Malaysia >> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E >> 62505 Putrajaya > MALAYSIA >> >>>

Askm Dato’ >>> >>>

Saya, Pensyarah Di USIM. Saya >>> telah >>> > dipaksa memanipulasi markah pelajar dan meluluskan pelajar kerana hanya > >>> dua pelajar lulus. Saya tidak mengubah markah kerana saya telah > memberi >>> markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan dan telah membuat > kelas >>> tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam sebelum peperiksaan untuk memperkasa > >>> pengetahuan pelajar. >>> >>> Saya telah menerima surat daripada > Dekan Fakulti Syariah & Undang2 >>> menyatakan fakulti kecewa kerana > saya enggan bekerjasama “memanipulasi >>> markah” (my understanding, the > exact wordings were “melihat/menyemak >>> semula secara menyeluruh > kaedah dan sistem penilaian yang dilakukan”.) >>> >>> Dekan juga menuduh > saya tidak efficient dalam pengajaran saya. >>> >>> Dato’, saya mohon > bantuan pihak Dato’ kerana saya dihukum kerana enggan > >>> memanipulasi markah pelajar agar ramai lulus kerana ianya tidak >>> > beretika. No telefon saya ialah deleted here. >>> Terima kasih. >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >

Reply from radinumx@mohe.gov.my to Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed; myk@mohe.gov.my, Please take note that ‘radinumx@mohe.gov.my’ EXCLUDED ME FROM THE MAILING LIST!!!!!!!!AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my [mailto:radinumx@mohe.gov.my]
> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed;
myk@mohe.gov.my
> Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my;
>
pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my;
>
mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
>
>
> Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan
> tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT.
>
>
>
> Terima kasih.
>

—– Forwarded Message —-
From: “myk@mohe.gov.my” <myk@mohe.gov.my>
To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah <tam@bpa.jpm.my>
Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed <mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my>; myk@mohe.gov.my; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa <mdzin@bpa.jpm.my>; Aziz bin Ismail <aziz@bpa.jpm.my>; myself
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 12:40:46 PM
Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

Dr. Tam,
Terima kasih. Akan kami uruskan saperti yang dicadangkan.
Yusof Kasim.

06 Mac 2009.
> Y.Bhg. Prof. Dato’.
>
> Terima kasih. Kerjasama dipohon sesalinan jawapan dihantar kepada pengadu
> juga.
>
> (Dr. Tam)
> 06 Mac 2009
>

From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my [mailto:radinumx@mohe.gov.my]
> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed; myk@mohe.gov.my
> Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my;
> pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my;
> mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT.
>
>
Terima kasih.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________
>
> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc
>
> Director General
>
> Department of Higher Education Malaysia
>
> Block E9, Parcel E, 62505 Putrajaya
>
> Malaysia

 

From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah [mailto:tam@bpa.jpm.my]
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM
> To: Mohd Asri bin Mohamed
> Cc: myself; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my;
> radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my;
> nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my;
> tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
>
>
> KPP (A4),
>
>
>
> Harap dapat kerjasama KPT untuk memberi maklum balas terus kepada pengadu
> terhadap perkara ini.
>
 Sekian, terima kasih.
>
KP
>
From: myself

> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah
> Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my;
> myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my;
> dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List
> Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Dr Tam Weng Wah
>
> KETUA PENGARAH
>
> BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM,
>
>
>
> Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada
> KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi
> Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah
> mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran
> tetapi belum  letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En
> Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.
>
>
>
> Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Ketua Program SMSU>
> Tarikh 28th August 2008
>Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings..>
> >
Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > Dekan FSU>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student >
>
Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda Timbalan Naib Canselor USIM>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM
>
Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA etua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut (yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini).

Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: “Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”
>
>
>
> Tuan Dr Tam,
>
>
>
> Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana
> berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada:
>
> 1.    Tidak diambil kira, atau.
> 2.    Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh
> pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA  KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI
> 2009) atau..
> 3.    Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau tidak, atau.
> 4.    Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalu
mereka-reka cerita, atau
> 5.    Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah.
> 6.    Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap.   

 

Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih.
>
>
>
> —– Forwarded Message —-
> From: myself
> To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Assalamualaikum Dato
>
>
>
> Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest
> development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the
> letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the
> view that my superiors are acting without impunity.
>
> Thank you.

(3 documents were attached)

 

Reply from myk@mohe.gov.my to tam@bpa.jpm.my, take note that myk included me in the cc column.

 

—– Forwarded Message —-
From: “myk@mohe.gov.my” <myk@mohe.gov.my>
To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah <tam@bpa.jpm.my>
Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed <mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my>; myk@mohe.gov.my; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa <mdzin@bpa.jpm.my>; Aziz bin Ismail <aziz@bpa.jpm.my>; myself
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 12:40:46 PM
Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

Dr. Tam,
Terima kasih. Akan kami uruskan saperti yang dicadangkan.
Yusof Kasim.

6 Mac 2009.
> Y.Bhg. Prof. Dato’.
>
> Terima kasih. Kerjasama dipohon sesalinan jawapan dihantar kepada pengadu
> juga.
>
> (Dr. Tam)
> 06 Mac 2009
>

From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my [mailto:radinumx@mohe.gov.my]
> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed;
myk@mohe.gov.my
> Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my;
>
pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my;
>
mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT.
>
>
Terima kasih.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________
>
> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc
>
> Director General
>
> Department of Higher Education Malaysia
>
> Block E9, Parcel E, 62505 Putrajaya
>
> Malaysia

 

From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah [mailto:tam@bpa.jpm.my]
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM
> To: Mohd Asri bin Mohamed
> Cc: myself; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my;
> radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my;
> nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my;
> tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
>
>
> KPP (A4),
>
>
>
> Harap dapat kerjasama KPT untuk memberi maklum balas terus kepada pengadu
> terhadap perkara ini.
>
 Sekian, terima kasih.
>
KP
>
From: myself

> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah
> Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my;
> myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my;
> dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List
> Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Dr Tam Weng Wah
>
> KETUA PENGARAH
>
> BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM,
>
>
>
> Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada
> KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi
> Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah
> mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran
> tetapi belum  letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En
> Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.
>
>
>
> Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Ketua Program SMSU>
> Tarikh 28th August 2008
>Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings..>
> >
Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > Dekan FSU>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student >
>
Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda Timbalan Naib Canselor USIM>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM
>
Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA etua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut (yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini).

Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: “Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”
>
>
>
> Tuan Dr Tam,
>
>
>
> Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana
> berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada:
>
> 1.    Tidak diambil kira, atau.
> 2.    Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh
> pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA  KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI
> 2009) atau..
> 3.    Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau tidak, atau.
> 4.    Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalu
mereka-reka cerita, atau
> 5.    Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah.
> 6.    Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap.   

 

Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih.
>
>
>
> —– Forwarded Message —-
> From: myself
> To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Assalamualaikum Dato
>
>
>
> Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest
> development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the
> letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the
> view that my superiors are acting without impunity.
>
> Thank you.

(3 documents were attached)

Jawapan Dr Tam kepada Prof Radin Umar whereby Dr Tam menyatakan “Kerjasama dipohon sesalinan jawapan dihantar kepada pengadu”

06 Mac 2009.
> Y.Bhg. Prof. Dato’.
>
> Terima kasih. Kerjasama dipohon sesalinan jawapan dihantar kepada pengadu
> juga.
>
> (Dr. Tam)
> 06 Mac 2009
>

From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my [mailto:radinumx@mohe.gov.my]
> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 11:23
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed;
myk@mohe.gov.my
> Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my;
>
pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my;
>
mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
Terima kasih. Datuk Yusuf TKP akan menyediakan kronologi sejarah dan tindakan-tindakan yang telah dilakukan oleh KPT.
>
>
Terima kasih.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________
>
> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc
>
> Director General
>
> Department of Higher Education Malaysia
>
> Block E9, Parcel E, 62505 Putrajaya
>
> Malaysia

 

From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah [mailto:tam@bpa.jpm.my]
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM
> To: Mohd Asri bin Mohamed
> Cc: myself; sidek@pmo.gov.my;
minister@mohe.gov.my;
>
radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my;
>
nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my;
>
tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
>
>
> KPP (A4),
>
>
>
> Harap dapat kerjasama KPT untuk memberi maklum balas terus kepada pengadu
> terhadap perkara ini.
>
 Sekian, terima kasih.
>
KP
>

From: myself

> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah
> Cc:
sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my;
>
myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my;
>
dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List
> Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Dr Tam Weng Wah
>
> KETUA PENGARAH
>
> BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM,
>
>
>
> Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada
> KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi
> Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah
> mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran
> tetapi belum  letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En
> Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.
>
>
>
> Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Ketua Program SMSU>
> Tarikh 28th August 2008
>Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings..>
> >
Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > Dekan FSU>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student >
>
Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda Timbalan Naib Canselor USIM>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM
>
Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA etua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut (yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini).

Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: “Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”
>
>
>
> Tuan Dr Tam,
>
>
>
> Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana
> berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada:
>
> 1.    Tidak diambil kira, atau.
> 2.    Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh
> pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA  KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI
> 2009) atau..
> 3.    Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau tidak, atau.
> 4.    Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalu
mereka-reka cerita, atau
> 5.    Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah.
> 6.    Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap.
     

Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih.
>
>
>
> —– Forwarded Message —-
> From: myself
> To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Assalamualaikum Dato
>
>
>
> Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest
> development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the
> letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the
> view that my superiors are acting without impunity.
>
> Thank you.

(3 documents were attached)

Jawapan email Dr. Tam Weng Wah KP BPA

From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah [mailto:tam@bpa.jpm.my]
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM
> To: Mohd Asri bin Mohamed
> Cc: myself;
sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my;
>
radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my;
>
nc@usim.edu.my; dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my;
>
tnc.hea@usim.edu.my; Md. Zin bin Musa; Aziz bin Ismail
> Subject: RE: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
>
>
> KPP (A4),
>
>
>
> Harap dapat kerjasama KPT untuk memberi maklum balas terus kepada pengadu
> terhadap perkara ini.
>
 Sekian, terima kasih.
>
KP
>
From: myself

> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah
> Cc:
sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my;
>
myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my;
>
dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List
> Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Dr Tam Weng Wah
>
> KETUA PENGARAH
>
> BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM,
>
>
>
> Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada
> KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi
> Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah
> mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran
> tetapi belum  letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En
> Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.
>
>
>
> Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Ketua Program SMSU>
> Tarikh 28th August 2008
>Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings..>
> >
Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > Dekan FSU>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student >
>
Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda Timbalan Naib Canselor USIM>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM
>
Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA etua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut (yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini).

Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: “Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”
>
>
>
> Tuan Dr Tam,
>
>
>
> Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana
> berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada:
>
> 1.    Tidak diambil kira, atau.
> 2.    Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh
> pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA  KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI
> 2009) atau..
> 3.    Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau tidak, atau.
> 4.    Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalu
mereka-reka cerita, atau
> 5.    Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah.
> 6.    Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap.
 

Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih.
>
>
>
> —– Forwarded Message —-
> From: myself
> To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Assalamualaikum Dato
>
>
>
> Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest
> development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the
> letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the
> view that my superiors are acting without impunity.
>
> Thank you.

(3 documents were attached)

Email saya kepada Ketua Pengarah BPA berkenaan USIM & KPT/MOHE

From: myself

> Sent: Fri 06/03/2009 7:59
> To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah
> Cc:
sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my;
>
myk@mohe.gov.my; pendaftar@usim.edu.my; nc@usim.edu.my;
>
dekanfsu@usim.edu.my; mnizam@usim.edu.my; tnc.hea@usim.edu.myMailing List
> Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Dr Tam Weng Wah
>
> KETUA PENGARAH
>
> BIRO PENGADUAN AWAM,
>
>
>
> Dilampirkan di sini email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 kepada
> KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi
> Y.BHG. PROF. DATO’ IR. DR. RADIN UMAR BIN RADIN SOHADI dimana saya telah
> mencapai ketepuan sabar (sudah tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesabaran
> tetapi belum  letak jawatan) kerana ketiga-tiga ketua saya iaitu En
> Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa dan Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda telah memperlakukan saya dengan biadap dan tidak adil. Saya telah menghantar bersama email tersebut, 3 pucuk surat berikut yang mengandungi maklumat terperinci apa yang diperlakukan oleh ketiga-tiga ketua saya.
>
>
>
> Surat kepada En Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali, Ketua Program SMSU>
> Tarikh 28th August 2008
>Tajuk Surat Meeting on 25th August 2008 and other meetings..>
> >
Surat kepada Prof Dr Haji Abdul Samat Musa > Dekan FSU>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Refusal to mark exam paper of one student >
>
Surat kepada Prof Dato’ Dr Muhamad Muda Timbalan Naib Canselor USIM>
Tarikh 28th August 2008
Tajuk Surat Request for official letter to leave USIM
>
Untuk makluman Tuan pihak KPT (melalui Timbalan Pengarah Datuk Prof. Mohd Yusof Bin Kasim) dalam surat bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 yang bertajuk “KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA” tidak MENYENTUH LANGSUNG ISI KANDUNGAN EMAIL SAYA YANG SAYA HANTAR KEPADA etua Pengarah KPT Prof Dato Radin Umar pada 9 September 2008 tersebut (yang saya hantar kepada Tuan hari ini).

Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis: “Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”
>
>
>
> Tuan Dr Tam,
>
>
>
> Diharap dapat membantu saya mendapat keadilan sewajarnya kerana
> berdasarkan surat daripada pihak KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009, aduan saya dalam bentuk email saya yang dihantar pada 9 September 2008 tidak disentuh langsung. Saya membuat kesimpulan apabila sesuatu aduan itu tidak disentuh langsung, ini bermakna aduan tersebut sama ada:
>
> 1.    Tidak diambil kira, atau.
> 2.    Diambil kira tetapi aduan itu dianggap sebagai tidak munasabah oleh
> pihak KPT kerana kelakuan biadap ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut dianggap wajar oleh pihak KPT, (KALAU SUDAH DIAMBIL KIRA  KENAPA PIHAK KPT TIDAK SENTUH LANGSUNG DALAM SURAT BERTARIKH 3 FEBRUARI
> 2009) atau..
> 3.    Pihak KPT tidak peduli sama ada saya diperlakukan dengan biadap atau tidak, atau.
> 4.    Pihak KPT menganggap saya sebagai pengadu bercakap bohong lalu
mereka-reka cerita, atau
> 5.    Pihak KPT tidak mempunyai bidang kuasa melayan aduan pensyarah.
> 6.    Pihak KPT tidak menganggap kelakuan ketua-ketua UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA tersebut sebagai biadap.

Tuan Dr Tan, saya mohon bantuan Tuan. Terima kasih.
>
>
>
> —– Forwarded Message —-
> From: myself
> To: radinumx@mohe..gov.my
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak
> efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
>
> Assalamualaikum Dato
>
>
>
> Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest
> development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the
> letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the
> view that my superiors are acting without impunity.
>
> Thank you.

(3 documents were attached)

Email kepada En Radzuan dari KOSMO! tentang KPT/MOHE & Dato’ Radin Umar

— On Wed, 4/15/09,
wrote:
From: myself
Subject: Penjelasan tindakan KPT:Pensyarah dipaksa berhenti
To: berita@kosmo.com.my, hisham.idris@kosmo.com.my, junhairi.alyasa@kosmo.com.my
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 9:37 PM

Encik Radzuan

Sebagaimana saya terangkan melalui telefon pada pukul 2020 tadi,

1. Saya mengadu kepada Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT pada 10 Jun 2008. KPT menjawab pada 10 Jun 2008 menyatakan” saya akan minta Prof Rujhan siasat dan membetulkan jika terdapat penyelewengan.”

2. Saya mengadu lagi kepada Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT pada 19 Jun 2008 selepas dicerca “You are a failure” dan dihalau “You should leave our university” oleh Timbalan Naib Canselor Akademik Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda pada hari yang sama (19 Jun 2008).KPT menjawab pada 24 Jun 2008 menyatakan “Im in Australia. Have asked Prof Rujhan to look into it.
3. Saya mengadu lagi pada 9 September 2008 kepada Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT menyatakan saya telah hilang sabar kerana ketua-ketua saya bertindak sesuka hati menganiaya saya tanpa merasa risau menerima hukuman. Saya tidak menerima jawapan langsung daripada Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT.
4. Saya meletak jawatan pada bulan November 2008 kerana USIM tidak berlaku adil terhadap saya.
5. Saya menulis email pada 27 November 2008 kepada Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT untuk berjumpanya berkenaan kedudukan saya di USIM. Tiada jawapandaripada Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT..
6. Saya menulis email pada 2 Disember 2008 kepada Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT menyatakan saya benar-benar perlukan bantuannya.Dato’ Radin Umar Ketua Pengarah IPTA,KPT menjawab pada 2 Disember 2008 “Could you see datuk yusof dep dg. He has been following yr case.”
7. Saya menerima surat daripada KPT bertarikh 3 Februari 2009 menyatakan:
” Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula”

Pada perenggan 4 surat tersebut, pihak KPT menulis:”Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan.”

8. Saya mengadu pada bulan Jun 2008 dan KPT hanya memberi jawapan pada Februari 2009 bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes saya.

9. Jika saya tahu jawapan KPT adalah seperti di atas, saya tidak akan meletak jawatan pada November 2008 iaitu 5 bulan selepas membuat aduan.

Harap maklum. Terima kasih Tuan-tuan.

MOHE’s INSENSITIVITY & BLATANT DISREGARD

To: myk@mohe.gov.my

Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my; sidek@pmo.gov.my; tam@bpa.jpm.my; minister@mohe.gov.my

Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 8:54:19 PM

Subject: Re: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA DATUK PROF. MOHD YUSOF BIN KASIM,

Merujuk kepada surat Tuan dengan rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 ( 7 ) bertarikh 6 Mac 2009 yang diterima pada 8 Mac 2009 dimana perenggan 2 dan 3 are being produced below.

2. Jabatan ini mengambil maklum akan isi kandungan emel puan tersebut mengenai tuduhan lisan yang didakwa dibuat oleh Timbalan Naib Canselor (Akademik & Antarabangsa) Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) terhadap puan. Walau bagaimanapun, pertikaian yang timbul adalah melibatkan antara puan dan pegawai USIM tersebut. Justeru, adalah tidak wajar sekiranya Jabatan ini dikehendaki menjawab perkara tersebut bagi pihak beliau.

3. Sehubungan itu, adalah lebih elok sekiranya perkara ini dibawa berunding dengan pihak USIM.

The contents of the aforementioned paragraph 3 clearly show that the KPT does not take regard of my emails to the KPT, sent on 03 December 2008 and 05 December 2008 respectively. Thus I infer from KPT’s disregard of the said emails that the KPT can’t be bothered with the victimization I experienced at USIM. The KPT have the gall to order me to revert to the very person who had victimized me, thus leaving me on a lurch, at the mercy of the very person who victimized me himself. This is a very unbecoming action on the part of the KPT. I express my disappointment towards the KPT’s blatant disregard and irresponsibility, executed with impunity with no trace of remorse whatsoever. Such disregard and irresponsibility are not in accord with KPT’s duty as the custodian of higher education.

Kindly be informed

BPA & MOHE & USIM= UNITED IN DECEIVING THE PUBLIC ABOUT USIM’S UNETHICAL MANIPULATION OF MARKS

From:

To: tam@bpa.jpm.my

Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my, ppm@pmo.gov.my

Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 8:02 AM

Selamat Pagi Tuan

Saya masih belum menerima daripada Tuan kronologi tindakan KPT yang Tuan sendiri arahkan untuk diberikan kepada pengadu (iaitu saya sendiri).

Mohon maklum balas terperinci KPT tersebut diberikan pada saya pada kadar yang segera pada fax:

Saya tidak bersetuju dengan pandangan Tuan bahawa siasatan KPT mengambil kira penjelasan-penjelasan terperinci kedua-dua pihak. Saya tidak dipanggil langsung oleh KPT semenjak aduan dibuat pada bulan Jun 2008.

 Saya yang terpaksa membuat temujanji berjumpa dengan KPengarah Dato Radin Umar pada bulan 11, itupun KPengarah Dato Radin Umar menyuruh saya berjumpa dengan TKP Dato Mohd Yusuf Kasim. Saya hanya dapat berjumpa TKP atas inisiatif saya sendiri pada bulan Disember iaitu hampir 6 bulan selepas aduan dibuat kepada KP. Saya berasa dukacita dengan keputusan Tuan yang berat sebelah. Saya merayu Tuan berlaku adil kepada saya. —–

Forwarded Message —-

 From:

To: tam@bpa.jpm.my

Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my;

ppm@pmo.gov.my

Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:04:41 PM

Subject: Kronologi tindakan KPT

Tuan

Merujuk kepada surat Tuan yang didakwa dihantar pada 20 mac 2009 tapi hanya bercop pada 23 Mac 2009, saya tidak mendapat langsung kronologi tindakan KPT yang Tuan sendiri arahkan untuk diberikan kepada pengadu (iaitu saya sendiri). Mohon maklum balas terperinci KPT tersebut diberikan pada saya pada kadar yang segera pada fax: 

 Saya tidak bersetuju dengan pandangan Tuan bahawa siasatan KPT mengambil kira penjelasan-penjelasan terperinci kedua-dua pihak. Saya tidak dipanggil langsung oleh KPT semenjak aduan dibuat pada bulan Jun 2008. Saya yang terpaksa membuat temujanji berjumpa dengan Pengarah pada bulan 11, itupun KPengarah menyuruh saya berjumpa dengan TKP. Saya hanya dapat berjumpa TKP atas inisiatif saya sendiri pada bulan Disember iaitu hampir 6 bulan selepas aduan dibuat kepada KP. Saya berasa dukacita dengan keputusan Tuan yang berat sebelah. Saya merayu Tuan berlaku adil kepada saya.

Me, Myself & BPA

From: Subject: Fw: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA
To: tam@bpa.jpm.my
Cc: puziah@bpa.jpm.my
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 8:34 PM

Tuan

Merujuk kepada email dibawah meskipun maklum balas rasmi BPA terhadap aduan saya telah pun dihantar kepada alamat seperti berikut pada 20 Mac 2009, samapai setakat ini 831pm 24/3/09 surat tersebut masih belum sampai ke alamat berikut.Harap maklum.

 

Sekian, terima kasih.

 

 

From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah <tam@bpa.jpm.my>
To:

Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:57:57 PM
Subject: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Puan ,

 

Berhubung dengan perkara ini BPA telah pun menerima ulasan yang dikemukakan oleh KPT dan maklum balas rasmi BPA terhadap aduan puan telah pun dihantar kepada alamat seperti berikut pada 20 Mac 2009:

 

Sekian, terima kasih.

 

(Dr. Tam)

23 Mac 2009
—– Forwarded Message —-
From:

To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah <tam@bpa.jpm.my>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 8:40:07 PM
Subject: Re: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Tuan Dr Tam   Am I jumping the gun to ask whether there is any positive outcome from BPA with respect to its official feedback? Please don’t get me wrong sir, I have not axes to grind, as far as I am concerned, based on the treatment I received from KPT, I conclude that the KPT is not interested to assist me.   Thank you Dr Tam.


From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah <tam@bpa.jpm.my>
To:

Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:57:57 PM
Subject: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Puan. 

Berhubung dengan perkara ini BPA telah pun menerima ulasan yang dikemukakan oleh KPT dan maklum balas rasmi BPA terhadap aduan puan telah pun dihantar kepada alamat seperti berikut pada 20 Mac 2009:

 

Sekian, terima kasih.

 

(Dr. Tam)

23 Mac 2009

 

From:

Sent: 20 Mac 2009 10:35
To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah
Cc: Puziah binti Saad
Subject: [SPAM:#] Fw: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

 

Tuan Dr Tam

Saya telah menerima surat daripada KPT melalui kurier kelmarin (18/3/09), tetapi surat itu hanyalah surat JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (  7  ) bertarikh 6 Mac 2009 yang diforwardkan dengan email di bawah.

 

Mohon nasihat Tuan berapa lamakah we should wait for the reply as mentioned by Y.Bhg. Prof. Dato’ Dr. Radin Umar on 6 March 2009.

Mohon maaf membebankan pihak BPA, tetapi saya tidak mempunyai pilihan lain.

Terima kasih atas pertolongan Tuan selama ini.

 

Yang Benar

 

—– Forwarded Message —-
From:

To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah <tam@bpa.jpm.my>
Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed <mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my>; Md. Zin bin Musa <mdzin@bpa.jpm.my>; Aziz bin Ismail <aziz@bpa.jpm.my>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:10:05 AM
Subject: Re: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Thank you so much Dr Tam.

 


From: Dr. Tam Weng Wah <tam@bpa.jpm.my>
To:

Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my; myk@mohe.gov.my; Mohd Asri bin Mohamed <mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my>; Md. Zin bin Musa <mdzin@bpa.jpm.my>; Aziz bin Ismail <aziz@bpa.jpm.my>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:28:54 AM
Subject: RE: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Puan , 

Thank you for the email. We are currently awaiting the reply from KPT regarding this matter as mentioned by Y.Bhg. Prof. Dato’ Dr. Radin Umur on 6 March 2009.

 

Thank you.

 

(Dr. Tam)

10 March 2009  

 


From:

Sent: Mon 09/03/2009 21:08
To: Dr. Tam Weng Wah
Cc: sidek@pmo.gov.my
Subject: Fw: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

 

 

—– Forwarded Message —-
From:
To: tam@bpa.jpm.my
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 9:05:37 PM
Subject: Fw: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Dr Tam,

 

The email below refers. The respective email dated 3rd of December 2008 mentioned below is produced below.  I will forward to your goodself the email dated 5th of December 2008 mentioned below after I send this email. Based on the KPT’s refusal to handle my grievance inferred from its reply reference no: JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (  7  ), I seek your assistance as the KP of the BPA, to enable me to get the justice I had been deprived of.

Awaiting your reply. Thank you. 

 

 

 

—– Forwarded Message —-
From:

To: myk@mohe.gov.my
Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my; sidek@pmo.gov.my; tam@bpa.jpm.my; minister@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 8:54:19 PM
Subject: Re: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

DATUK PROF. MOHD YUSOF BIN KASIM,

Merujuk kepada surat Tuan dengan rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (  7  )
bertarikh 6 Mac 2009 yang diterima pada 8 Mac 2009 dimana perenggan 2 dan 3 are being produced below.

2.    Jabatan ini mengambil maklum akan isi kandungan emel puan tersebut
mengenai tuduhan lisan yang didakwa dibuat oleh Timbalan Naib Canselor
(Akademik & Antarabangsa) Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) terhadap
puan.  Walau bagaimanapun, pertikaian yang timbul adalah melibatkan antara
puan dan pegawai USIM tersebut. Justeru, adalah tidak wajar sekiranya
Jabatan ini dikehendaki menjawab perkara tersebut bagi pihak beliau.

3.    Sehubungan itu, adalah lebih elok sekiranya perkara ini dibawa
berunding dengan pihak USIM.

The contents of the aforementioned paragraph 3 clearly show that the KPT does not take regard of my emails to the KPT, sent on 03 December 2008 and 05 December 2008 respectively. Thus I infer from KPT’s disregard of the said emails that the KPT can’t be bothered with the victimization I experienced at USIM. The KPT have the gall to order me to revert to the very person who had victimized me, thus leaving me on a lurch, at the mercy of the very person who victimized me himself. This is a very unbecoming action on the part of the KPT.

 

I express my disappointment towards the KPT’s blatant disregard and irresponsibility, executed with impunity with no trace of remorse whatsoever. Such disregard and irresponsibility are not in accord with KPT’s duty as the custodian of higher education.

 

Kindly be informed.

 


From: Mira Aisa binti Shaarani <mira@mohe.gov.my>
To:

Cc: myk@mohe.gov.my; dg@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 11:01:35 AM
Subject: ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Rujukan Kami    : JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (  7  )
Tarikh        : 6 Mac 2009

Puan,

ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS
ISLAM MALAYSIA

Dengan hormatnya saya merujuk kepada e-mel puan bertarikh 3 Mac 2009 dan
surat Jabatan ini rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5) bertarikh 2 Februari
2009 adalah berkaitan.

2.    Jabatan ini mengambil maklum akan isi kandungan emel puan tersebut
mengenai tuduhan lisan yang didakwa dibuat oleh Timbalan Naib Canselor
(Akademik & Antarabangsa) Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) terhadap
puan.  Walau bagaimanapun, pertikaian yang timbul adalah melibatkan antara
puan dan pegawai USIM tersebut. Justeru, adalah tidak wajar sekiranya
Jabatan ini dikehendaki menjawab perkara tersebut bagi pihak beliau.

3.    Sehubungan itu, adalah lebih elok sekiranya perkara ini dibawa
berunding dengan pihak USIM.

Sekian, terima kasih.

“BERKHIDMAT UNTUK NEGARA”

Yang ikhlas,

(DATUK PROF. MOHD YUSOF BIN KASIM)
Timbalan Ketua Pengarah (Sektor IPTA)
Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia

s.k.

KP, JPT

Y.Bhg. Dato’ Prof. Dr. Abdul Shukor b. Hj. Husin
Naib Canselor
Universiti  Sains Islam Malaysia
Bandar Baru Nilai
71800 Nilai
NEGERI SEMBILAN

No. Tel    :  06-7988013
No. Faks    :  06-7941143

Tuan Hj. Addenan bin Hj. Abdul Rahman
Pendaftar
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)
Bandar Baru Nilai
71800 Nilai
NEGERI SEMBILAN

No. Tel    :06-7988101
No. Fax    :06-7993843

Announcement Until today (3 May 2009) the inefficient & CORRUPT , MOHE never answered MY QUERIES!!!

THE MOHE IS PROTECTED BY THE POWERS THAT BE (BPA & THE KSN KNOW ABOUT THIS BUT SHUT THEIR EYES), SHIELDING  USIM & MMU WHICH FOOL THE PUBLIC AT LARGE BY MANIPULATING & INFLATING MARKS. UNTIL WHEN WILL YOU CONTINUE YOUR SCAMS?????? HAVE YOU NO SHAME, PRETENDING TO BE THE CUSTODIAN OF INTEGRITY?????

Mind Boggling & Illogical=MOHE finds “Senat USIM bertindak wajar”??????

From:

To: myk@mohe.gov.my

 Cc: tam@bpa.jpm.my; sidek@pmo.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my; radinumx@mohe.gov.my

Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 11:39:46 AM

Subject: Jawapan surat rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5) Datuk Prof Mohd Yusof bin Kasim,

Merujuk kepada surat rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5), pada perenggan dua berikut: “2. Sebagaimana Puan sedia maklum, Jabatan ini telah menerima aduan Puan mengenai isu Puan dituduh tidak efisyen kerana enggan bekerjasama dalam menilai semula markah pelajar yang mengikuti kelas Puan pada 15 Jun 2008. Jabatan ini melalui suratnya kepada Naib Canselor Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (1) bertarikh 27 Jun 2008 telahpun melakukan siasatan ke atas isu seperti di atas dan mendapati bahawa Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula.”

Saya ingin membetulkan kekhilafan fakta dalam perenggan di atas. Saya tidak membuat aduan pada 15 Jun 2008 tetapi membuat aduan pada 10 Jun 2008. Berkenaan dengan dapatan di atas yang Jabatan terima iaitu “Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula”, sila jelaskan perkara-perkara di bawah selewat-lewatnya pada 16 Mac 2009 kepada: 

 My email address & correspondence address.

Perkara-perkara yang Jabatan perlu jelaskan:

1. Memberi tarikh sebenar dapatan tersebut didapati oleh Jabatan (kindly explain the exact date the department decided and concluded that, the USIM Senate had “bertindak wajar” and had the right to request that the marking be re-evaluated).

2. On what basis does the department conclude that the Senate had “bertindak wajar”?

3. Who vests to the senate the right to request that the marking be re-evaluated?

3. What are the rights of the Senate?

4. Provide the justification(s) for the Senate to order the re-evaluation of my marking.

5. What is the power conferred to the Senate to order the re-evaluation of the marks? Cite the legal authority/clause empowering the Senate to order the re-evaluation of my marking?

6. Who confers the power to the Senate as the highest authority in academic matters to order the re-evaluation of my marking?

7. Explain The National Higher Education Strategic Plan.

8. Does the power exercised by the Senate of USIM violate the abovementioned National Higher Education Strategic Plan? If it does not violate such Plan, provide the justifications.

Harap Maklum. Terima kasih.

MOHE’s SECOND OFFICIAL REPLY

Rujukan Kami    : JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (  7  )
Tarikh        : 6 Mac 2009

Puan,

ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

Dengan hormatnya saya merujuk kepada e-mel puan bertarikh 3 Mac 2009 dan surat Jabatan ini rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5) bertarikh 2 Februari 2009 adalah berkaitan.

2.    Jabatan ini mengambil maklum akan isi kandungan emel puan tersebut
mengenai tuduhan lisan yang didakwa dibuat oleh Timbalan Naib Canselor
(Akademik & Antarabangsa) Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) terhadap
puan.  Walau bagaimanapun, pertikaian yang timbul adalah melibatkan antara puan dan pegawai USIM tersebut. Justeru, adalah tidak wajar sekiranya Jabatan ini dikehendaki menjawab perkara tersebut bagi pihak beliau.

3.    Sehubungan itu, adalah lebih elok sekiranya perkara ini dibawa
berunding dengan pihak USIM.

Sekian, terima kasih.

“BERKHIDMAT UNTUK NEGARA”

Yang ikhlas,

(DATUK PROF. MOHD YUSOF BIN KASIM)
Timbalan Ketua Pengarah (Sektor IPTA)
Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia

s.k.

KP, JPT

Y.Bhg. Dato’ Prof. Dr. Abdul Shukor b. Hj. Husin
Naib Canselor
Universiti  Sains Islam Malaysia
Bandar Baru Nilai
71800 Nilai
NEGERI SEMBILAN

No. Tel    :  06-7988013
No. Faks    :  06-7941143

Tuan Hj. Addenan bin Hj. Abdul Rahman
Pendaftar
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)
Bandar Baru Nilai
71800 Nilai
NEGERI SEMBILAN

No. Tel    :06-7988101
No. Fax    :06-7993843

My first reply to MOHE’s official letter

—– Forwarded Message —-
From:

To: myk@mohe.gov.my
Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my; minister@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2009 11:12:14 AM
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

Datuk Professor Mohd Yusof bin Kasim
Merujuk surat Datuk bertarikh 3 februari 2009, Datuk tidak menjawab aduan saya di bawah yang telah dibuat kepada Dato Radin Umar. Memandangkan Dato Radin Umar, mula-mula serahkan aduan saya kepada Prof Rujhan dan kemudian kepada Prof Datuk Mohd Yusof bin Kasim, jadi saya tiada pilihan lain but to revert to Prof Datuk Mohd Yusof bin Kasim,  to request that your goodself reply to my query. Memandangkan aduan telah dibuat hampir sembilan bulan lalu, sila berikan jawapan selewat-lewatnya 8 Februari 2009.
Terima kasih .
 
Yang Benar
—– Forwarded Message —-
From:
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:56:28 PM
Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
Assalamualaikum Dato I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, TNC (Academic) today

at 12.30 pm. 

He shouted at me and said the following to me:

 

1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your students fail .

The government can spend a lot of money training but it’s no use if the students fail.

2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the wrong place.

Our university rates our students based on their development.

(Before he made his remark, I explained to him that I grade the exam papers based on the

merit and cogency of the answer based on the marking scheme).

3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter that he wants me to

quit teaching as I am not suitable for the university)

4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority of them failed?

5. What do you think of our students?You look down at our students!

 

Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM for justice, as the

TNC(Academic) himself had asked me to leave the university.

 

Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as I did not do anything wrong.

 I marked the papers based on merit and cogency. I am truly victimised here

and the insults and demand to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda today is truly an affront to me

and the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

 

Please Dato, I ask for justice.

 

Yours sincerely

 
— On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To: “

Cc: “mrujhan” <mrujhan@mohe.gov.my>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato' Radin Umar
Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

> Dato'
>   Sy mohon bantuan Dato' kerana sy baru 6 bulan
bekerja di sini dan sy
> memang tidak diperlakukan dengan adil
meskipun saya berkata benar.
> Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato'.
>
> Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar radinumx@mohe.gov.my
wrote:
>
> lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran.
Saya yakin Pengurusan USIM akan
> menanganinya secara adil
> ________________________________
> Professor Dato' Radin Umar
> Director General
> Department of Higher Education
> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>
>> Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.
Diharap dapat menolong
>> saya.
>>
>> Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote:
>> Assalamualaikum,
>>
>> Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan siasat
dan membetulkan jika
>> terdapat penyelewengan.
>>
>> Salam.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Professor Dato' Radin Umar
>> Director General
>> Department of Higher Education
>> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
>> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
>> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>>
>>> Askm Dato'
>>>
>>> Saya , Pensyarah Di USIM. Saya
telah dipaksa memanipulasi markah pelajar dan
meluluskan pelajar kerana hanya dua pelajar lulus.
Saya tidak mengubah markah kerana saya telah
memberi markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan
dan telah membuat kelas tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam
sebelum peperiksaan untuk memperkasa pengetahuan pelajar.
>>>
>>> Saya telah menerima surat daripada Dekan 
Fakulti Syariah & Undang2 menyatakan fakulti kecewa 
kerana saya enggan bekerjasama "memanipulasi markah"
(my understanding, the exact wordings were
"melihat/menyemak semula secara menyeluruh kaedah dan
sistem penilaian yang
dilakukan".)
>>>
>>> Dekan juga menuduh saya tidak efficient dalam
pengajaran saya.
>>>
>>> Dato', saya mohon bantuan pihak Dato' kerana
saya dihukum kerana enggan memanipulasi markah pelajar
agar ramai lulus kerana ianya tidak beretika.
No telefon saya ialah
>>> Terima kasih.
>>>

After much ding dong I received an official reply from MOHE in February 2009 (nearly 8 mths after I complained)

                                Rujukan kami: JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 (5)

                                                      Tarikh: 3 Februari 2009

 

Puan,

ADUAN MENGENAI ISU KETIDAKADILAN TERHADAP PENSYARAH DI UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA

2. Sebagaimana Puan sedia maklum, Jabatan ini telah menerima aduan Puan mengenai isu Puan dituduh tidak efisyen kerana enggan bekerjasama dalam menilai semula markah pelajar yang mengikuti kelas Puan pada 15 Jun 2008. Jabatan ini melalui suratnya kepada Naib Canselor Universiti Islam Sains Malaysia (USIM) rujukan JPT (A) 1000/011/011/04 bertarikh 27 Jun 2008 telahpun melakukan siasatan ke atas isu seperti tersebut di atas dan mendapati bahawa Senat USIM telah bertindak wajar atas kapasitinya selaku authority tertinggi dalam hal ehwal akademik dan mempunyai hak untuk memohon markah pelajar dinilai semula.

3. Jabatan ini sekali lagi menerima aduan dari Puan pada 3 Disember 2008 mengenai isu ketidakadilan yang berlaku terhadap Puan sehingga mendorong Puan meletakkan jawatan selaku Pensyarah Universiti Gred DS45 berkuatkuasa mulai 18 Disember 2008 melalui surat Puan kepada Pengurusan USIM bertarikh 17 November 2008. Jabatan ini telah sekali lagi meminta laporan maklum balas Pengurusan Tertinggi USIM mengenai perkara ini melalui percakapan lisan antara saya dan Tuan Addenan bin Hj Abdul Rahman, Pendaftar USIM. Jabatan ini telah meneliti laporan tersebut dan mendapati perkara-perkara berikut:

a) Urusan permohonan perletakan jawatan Puan 

     adalah mengikut prosedur yang telah ditetapkan

     oleh USIM.

 

b) USIM berhak untuk menerima atau menolak

    permohonan perletakan jawatan Puan; dan

 

c) USIM mempunyai kuasa autonomi dalam hal ehwal

    pengurusan dan pentadbiran akademik Universiti.

 

4. Setelah mengambil kira kesemua aspek perbincangan antara saya, Puan dan juga Pengurusan USIM, saya mendapati bahawa tidak timbul sebarang salah laku dari aspek perundangan berhubung kes Puan. Sepertimana Puan sedia maklum, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi (KPT) tidak mempunyai sebarang kuasa atas aspek pengambilan, pelantikan serta perletakan jawatan sebarang urusan perjawatan akademik Universiti. Sebarang perkara lanjut mengenai perkara ini perlulah dirujuk secara terus dengan pihak Pengurusan USIM sendiri.

5. Adalah diharapkan Puan mengambil maklum dengan penjelasan dan pendirian KPT berhubung perkara ni. Saya ingin mengucapkan berbanyak terima kasih atas sumbangan Puan kepada pengajian tinggi selama ini dan berdoa agar Puan akan terus maju jaya dalam apa jua bidang kelak. Kerjasama dan perhatian Puan dalam perkara ini amat saya hargai dan didahului dengan ucapan terima kasih.

Sekian, 

“BERKHIDMAT UNTUK NEGARA”

 

Yang ikhlas,

 

(DATUK PROF. MOHD YUSOF BIN KASIM)

Timbalan Ketua Pengarah (Sektor IPTA)

Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi

Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia

Meeting with Datuk Prof Mohd. Yusof Kasim

This person had the nerve to say these things to me:
1. What do you want me to do? (Prof Dato Radin wrote in his email that this guy had been following my case, if he had been following the case, why did he ask me that question.)
2. The poor results is a reflection of your poor teaching (Please look at the samples of the answers given, the students’ poor command of the English language signifies a weakness beyond my control. These students learnt English since they were in Standard One.Furthermore the midsem & final exam questions are easy!)
Sample answer USIM undergraduate 1060558
4 instances of Talaq Bain Sughra.
1. The husband pronounce the wife not get the consummet from the husband, the wife not the period iddah after the divorce.
2. The husband divorce the wife time period the wife must After 3x suci from it For the husband ruju’.
3. The wife in the hamil must born the baby for the husband ruju’ him.

Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060595

The instances of Talaq Bain Kubra is the husband pronounced the divorce during the wife pregnant and already consumption When the husband divorce her wife during the pregnant the talaq not effected until the born of baby. The husband can revocked divorce during period of pregnants.

 

 a. I said to this Prof  that I even gave the students the exam questions before they sat for their exam!! Therefore I demanded from MOHE its stand, whether my standard is too HIGH FOR  UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA. If my standard is too HIGH, than my conscience is clear, it is USIM which has low standards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
b. I also demanded MOHE’s decision as to whether Prof Muhamad Muda had the right to condemn me to be a FAILURE & that I SHOULD LEAVE UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA.
c.  I also informed him that the NC, Prof Dr Abd Shukor Husin accused me of mempunyai hubungan with a Dean  of UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA.
d. I demanded from MOHE, to restore justice to me as I had been victimised and I have reported to MOHE since June 2008.

Appointment to see Deputy DG HE, MOHE

From:

To: myk@mohe.gov.my

 Cc: radinumx@mohe.gov.my

Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:21:17 +0800

Subject: Fwd: Re: Fw: Appointment to see Dato

Askm Datuk I would like to make an urgent request to see you regarding my being victimised at USIM.

Yang Benar

My reply to Prof Radin who asked me to see his deputy

 
From:
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:56:45 +0800
Subject: Re: Fw: Appointment to see Dato
 I will do so Datuk, thank you.

Prof Radin’s reply on 2 December 2008: He asked me to see his deputy

Message—–
From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
To:
Cc: myk@mohe.gov.my
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:39:26 GMT
Subject: Re: Fw: Appointment to see Dato

Could you see datuk yusof dep dg. He has been
following yr case

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device via
Vodafone-Celcom Mobile.

Still no reply from Prof Radin Umar so I emailed again on 2 December 2008




 












— On Tue, 12/2/08,  wrote:


From: Subject: Fw: Appointment to see Dato
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 7:25 AM







Assalamualaikum Dato

 

I was informed by Dato that Prof Rujhan will investigate my grievance, however until today I have not been contacted by Prof Rujhan.

I have tendered my resignation at USIM as I continue to be victimised, Dato I really need your assistance as I regret my resignation and I want to get my justice,

 

Yang benar


— On Thu, 11/27/08,  wrote:


From:


Subject: Appointment to see Dato
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 8:11 AM







Asskm Dato

I would like to see Dato with regard to my position in USIM. I would really appreciate if Dato could meet me,

Thank you









 


No reply from Prof Radin Umar so I emailed on 27 November 2008

—– Forwarded Message —-

From:

To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my

Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 8:11:33 AM

Subject: Appointment to see Dato

Asskm Dato I would like to see Dato with regard to my position in USIM. I would really appreciate if Dato could meet me, Thank you

Since 25/6/08 Nobody from MOHE contacted me so I emailed to Prof Radin Umar on 9/9/2008

From 25th June 2008 until 9th September 2008, nobody from the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) CONTACTED ME REGARDING MY COMPLAINT!!! So, I emailed to Prof Radin Umar the following on 9th September 2008.

—– Forwarded Message —-
From:
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 8:16:00 AM
Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
Assalamualaikum Dato
 
Selamat Menyambut Ramadan . I would like to apprise Dato my latest development at USIM. I have reached the end of my tether. Attached are the letters which are self explanatory. I am writing to Dato as I am of the view that my superiors are acting without impunity.
Thank you.

— On Tue, 6/24/08, radinumx@mohe.gov.my <radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To:

Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 4:50 PM

Im in australia. Have asked prof rujhan to look into it
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device via Vodafone-Celcom Mobile.

My reply to Prof Radin’s email on 24 June 2008

—– Forwarded Message —-
From: myself
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:47:05 AM
Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
 

Thank you Dato.—

 

On Tue, 6/24/08, radinumx@mohe.gov.my <radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: radinumx@mohe.gov.my <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient

 kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To:

Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 4:50 PM

Im in australia. Have asked prof rujhan to look into it

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device via Vodafone-Celcom Mobile.

 


From:
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient
kerana enggan manipulasi markah

 

— On Thu, 6/19/08,  wrote:

From:

Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient

kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 2:56 PM

Assalamualaikum Dato I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, TNC (Academic) today at 12.30 pm. He shouted at me and said the following to me:

 

1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your students fail .

The government can spend a lot of money training but it’s no use if the students fail.

2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the wrong place.

Our university rates our students based on their development.

(Before he made his remark,

I explained to him that I grade the exam papers based on the merit and

cogency of the answer

based on the marking scheme).

3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter that

he wants me to quit

teaching as I am not suitable for the university)

4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority of them failed?

5. What do you think of our students?You look down at our students!

 

Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM for justice,

as the TNC(Academic)

himself had asked me to leave the university.

 

Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as I did not do anything wrong.

I marked the

papers based on merit and cogency. I am truly victimised here and the 

insults and demand

to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda today is truly an affront to me and the straw

that breaks the camel’s back.

 

Please Dato, I ask for justice.

 

Yours sincerely

 
— On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar

<radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To:

Cc: “mrujhan” <mrujhan@mohe.gov.my>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato' Radin Umar Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA  >
Dato' >   Sy mohon bantuan Dato' kerana
sy baru 6 bulan bekerja
di sini dan sy > memang tidak diperlakukan
dengan adil
meskipun saya berkata benar. >
Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato'. > >
Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar
radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote: > > 
lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran. Saya
 yakin Pengurusan USIM akan >
menanganinya secara adil
________________________________ >
Professor Dato' Radin Umar > Director General >
Department of Higher Education >
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia > Level 3,
Block E9, Parcel E > 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA > >>
Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.
Diharap dapat
menolong >> saya. >> >>
Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote: >>
Assalamualaikum, >> >>
Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan siasat
dan membetulkan
jika >> terdapat penyelewengan. >> >> Salam. >> >> _____
___________________________ >>
Professor Dato' Radin Umar >> Director General >>
Department of Higher Education >>
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia >> Level 3,
Block E9,
 Parcel E >> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA >> >>>
Askm Dato' >>> >>> Saya , Pensyarah Di USIM.
Saya >>> telah >>> dipaksa memanipulasi markah
pelajar dan
meluluskan pelajar kerana hanya >>> dua pelajar
lulus.
Saya tidak mengubah markah kerana saya
telah memberi >>>
markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan dan telah
membuat kelas >>> tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam
sebelum peperiksaan untuk memperkasa >>>
pengetahuan pelajar. >>> >>> Saya telah menerima
surat daripada Dekan Fakulti Syariah & Undang2 >>>
menyatakan fakulti kecewa kerana saya enggan
bekerjasama "memanipulasi >>> markah"
(my understanding, the exact wordings
were "melihat/menyemak >>> semula secara
menyeluruh kaedah dan sistem penilaian
yang dilakukan".) >>> >>> Dekan juga menuduh saya
tidak efficient dalam pengajaran saya. >>> >>>
Dato', saya mohon bantuan pihak Dato' kerana
saya dihukum
kerana enggan
 >>> memanipulasi markah pelajar agar ramai lulus
kerana ianya tidak >>> beretika.
No telefon saya ialah  >>> Terima kasih. >>>
>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >

Prof Radin Umar’s Reply with regard to Prof Muhammad Muda’s Verbal Abuse Towards Me

—– Forwarded Message —-
From: “radinumx@mohe.gov.my” <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
To: myself; mrujhan@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:50:06 PM
Subject: Re: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
Im in australia. Have asked prof rujhan to look into it

 

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device via Vodafone-Celcom Mobile.


From: myself

Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw:

Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

— On Thu, 6/19/08, > wrote:

From:

Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 2:56 PM

Assalamualaikum Dato I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, TNC (Academic) today at 12.30 pm. He shouted at me and said the following to me:

1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your students fail . The government can spend a lot of money training but it’s no use if the students fail.

2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the wrong place. Our university rates our students based on their development.(Before he made his remark, I explained to him that I grade the exam papers based on the merit and cogency of the answer based on the marking scheme).

3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter that he wants me to quit teaching as I am not suitable for the university)

4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority of them failed?

5. What do you think of our students?You look down at our students!

Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM for justice, as the TNC(Academic) himself had asked me to leave the university.

Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as I did not do anything wrong. I marked the papers based on merit and cogency. I am truly victimised here and the insults and demand to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda today is truly an affront to me and the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

Please Dato, I ask for justice.

Yours sincerely

 
— On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To:

Cc: “mrujhan” <mrujhan@mohe.gov.my>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.

Still no reply from Prof Radin so I forwarded again on 24 June 08

—– Forwarded Message —-
From: myself
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 7:21:19 AM
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw:
Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
— On Thu, 6/19/08, > wrote:

From:

Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana

enggan manipulasi markah
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 2:56 PM

Assalamualaikum Dato I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, TNC (Academic) today at 12.30 pm. 

He shouted at me and said the following to me:

 

1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your students fail .

The government can spend a lot of money training but it’s no use

if the students fail.

2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the wrong place.

Our university rates our students based on their development.(Before he made

his remark, I explained to him that I grade the exam papers based on

the merit and cogency of the

answer based on the marking scheme).

3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter that he

wants me to quit teaching as I am not suitable for the university)

4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority of them failed?

5. What do you think of our students?You look down at our students!

 

Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM for justice, as

the TNC(Academic)

himself had asked me to leave the university.

 

Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as I did not do anything wrong.

 I marked the papers based on merit and cogency. I am truly victimised here

and the insults

and demand to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda today is truly an affront

 to me and the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

 

Please Dato, I ask for justice.

 

Yours sincerely
— On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar

<radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To: “
Cc: “mrujhan” <mrujhan@mohe.gov.my>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato' Radin Umar
Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

> Dato'
>   Sy mohon bantuan Dato' kerana sy baru 6 bulan
bekerja di sini dan sy
> memang tidak diperlakukan dengan adil meskipun
saya berkata benar.
> Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato'.
>
> Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar 
<radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:
>
> lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran. Saya yakin
Pengurusan USIM akan
> menanganinya secara adil
> ________________________________
> Professor Dato' Radin Umar
> Director General
> Department of Higher Education
> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>
>> Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.
Diharap dapat menolong
>> saya.
>>
>> Professor Dato' Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote:
>> Assalamualaikum,
>>
>> Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan 
siasat
dan membetulkan jika terdapat penyelewengan.
>>
>> Salam.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Professor Dato' Radin Umar
>> Director General
>> Department of Higher Education
>> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
>> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
>> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>>
>>> Askm Dato'
>>>
>>> Saya , Pensyarah Di USIM. Saya
>>> telah
>>> dipaksa memanipulasi markah pelajar 
dan meluluskan
pelajar kerana hanya dua pelajar lulus. Saya tidak
mengubah markah kerana saya telah
memberi markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan dan
telah membuat kelas tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam
sebelum peperiksaan untuk memperkasa 
pengetahuan pelajar.
>>>
Saya telah menerima surat daripada Dekan Fakulti 
Syariah & Undang2 menyatakan fakulti kecewa 
kerana saya enggan
bekerjasama "memanipulasi markah" 
(my understanding,
the exact wordings were "melihat/menyemak 
semula secara
menyeluruh kaedah dan sistem penilaian yang
dilakukan".)
>>>
Dekan juga menuduh saya tidak efficient 
dalam pengajaran saya.
>>>
>>> Dato', saya mohon bantuan pihak Dato' 
kerana saya dihukum
kerana enggan memanipulasi markah pelajar 
agar ramai lulus
kerana ianya tidak beretika. 
No telefon saya ialah
>>> Terima kasih.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>

Email ‘Being shouted at’ forwarded to Prof Rujhan

—– Forwarded Message —-
From: Myself

To: mrujhan@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:16:50 PM
Subject: Fw: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

 

— On Thu, 6/19/08, > wrote:

From:
Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit Fw: Re: Dihukum
tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah
To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008, 2:56 PM

Assalamualaikum Dato
 
I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda, TNC (Academic) today
at 12.30 pm. He shouted at me and said the following to me:
 
1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your students fail .
The government can spend a lot of money training but it’s no use if the
students fail.
2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the wrong place.
Our university rates our students based on their development.(Before he made
 his remark, I explained to him that I grade the exam papers based on the
merit and cogency of the answer based on the marking scheme).
3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter that

he wants me to quit teaching as I am not suitable for the university)
4. Can your students understand your teaching as a majority of

them failed?
5. What do you think of our students?You look down at our students!
 
Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM for justice, as
the TNC(Academic) himself had asked me to leave the university.
 
Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as I did not do anything wrong.
 I marked the papers based on merit and cogency. I am truly

victimised here and the insults and demand

to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda today is truly
an affront to me and the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

Please Dato, I ask for justice.

Yours sincerely
— On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar
<radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar

<radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana

enggan manipulasi markah
To: “
Cc: “mrujhan” <mrujhan@mohe.gov.my>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato' Radin Umar
Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

> Dato'
>   Sy mohon bantuan Dato' kerana sy baru 6 bulan
bekerja di sini dan sy memang tidak diperlakukan
dengan adil meskipun saya berkata benar.

> Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato’.
>
> Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar

radinumx@mohe.gov.my wrote:
>
> lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran. Saya yakin Pengurusan USIM akan
> menanganinya secara adil
> ________________________________
> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar
> Director General
> Department of Higher Education
> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>
>> Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.Diharap dapat menolong
>> saya.
>>
>> Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote:
>> Assalamualaikum,
>>
>> Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan siasat dan membetulkan jika terdapat penyelewengan.
>>
>> Salam.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar
>> Director General
>> Department of Higher Education
>> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
>> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
>> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>>
>>> Askm Dato’
>>>
>>> Saya , Pensyarah Di USIM. Saya telah dipaksa memanipulasi markah pelajar dan meluluskan pelajar kerana hanya dua pelajar lulus. Saya tidak mengubah markah kerana saya telah memberi markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan dan telah membuat kelas
>>> tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam sebelum peperiksaan untuk memperkasa pengetahuan pelajar.
>>>
>>> Saya telah menerima surat daripada Dekan Fakulti Syariah & Undang2 menyatakan fakulti kecewa kerana saya enggan bekerjasama “memanipulasi markah” (my understanding, the exact wordings were
“melihat/menyemak semula secara menyeluruh kaedah dan sistem penilaian yang
dilakukan”.)
>>>
>>> Dekan juga menuduh saya tidak efficient dalam pengajaran saya.
>>>
>>> Dato’, saya mohon bantuan pihak Dato’ kerana saya dihukum kerana enggan memanipulasi markah pelajar agar ramai lulus kerana ianya tidak
>>> beretika. No telefon saya ialah >>> Terima kasih.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

My email to Prof Radin after being chased out by TNCA USIM

From: my real name

To: radinumx@mohe.gov.my
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 2:56:28 PM
Subject: Being shouted at & asked to quit
: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

 

Assalamualaikum Dato I went to see Prof Dato Dr Muhammad Muda,

TNC (Academic) today at 12.30 pm. He shouted at me and said

the following to me:

1. You are a failure.Your effort goes down the drain because your

students fail .

The government can spend a lot of money training but it’s

no use if the students fail.

2. You are not suitable for our university. You are at the

wrong place.

Our university rates our students based on their development.

(Before he made his remark, I explained to him that I grade

the exam papers based on the merit and cogency of the answer

based on the marking scheme).

3. You should leave our university. (I asked him to issue a letter

that he wants me to quit teaching as I am not suitable

for the university)

4. Can your students understand your teaching

as a majority of them failed?

5. What do you think of our students?You look down

at our students!

Dato, I am not going to the upper management of USIM

for justice, as the TNC(Academic) himself had 

me to leave the university.

Dato, I am asking for your help to assist me as

I did not do anything wrong.

I marked the papers based on merit and cogency.

I am truly victimised here

and the insults and demand to quit by Dr Muhammad Muda

is truly an affront to me and

the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

Please Dato, I ask for justice.

Yours sincerely

 
— On Wed, 6/11/08, Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar

<radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar

<radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana

enggan manipulasi markah
To:
Cc: “mrujhan” <mrujhan@mohe.gov.my>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:42 AM

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato’ Radin Umar
Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

> Dato’
>   Sy mohon bantuan Dato’ kerana sy baru 6 bulan

bekerja di sini dan sy memang tidak diperlakukan

dengan adil meskipun saya berkata benar.
> Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato’.
>
> Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar

radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:
>
> lakukan yang betul demi kebenaran.

Saya yakin Pengurusan
USIM akan menanganinya secara adil
> ________________________________
> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar
> Director General
> Department of Higher Education
> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>
>> Terima kasih Dato, saya masih dalam ketakutan.

Diharap dapat menolong saya.
>>
>> Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar wrote:
>> Assalamualaikum,
>>
>> Terima aksih. saya akan minta Prof Rujhan

siasat dan membetulkan jika

terdapat penyelewengan.
>>
>> Salam.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Professor Dato’ Radin Umar
>> Director General
>> Department of Higher Education
>> Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
>> Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
>> 62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA
>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>> Askm Dato’
>>>
>>> Saya xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Pensyarah Di USIM.

 Saya telah dipaksa memanipulasi markah pelajar dan
meluluskan pelajar kerana hanya dua pelajar lulus.
Saya tidak mengubah markah kerana saya telah
memberi markah dengan adil mengikut skema jawapan
dan telah membuat kelas tambahan sebanyak 6-8jam
sebelum peperiksaan untuk
memperkasa pengetahuan pelajar.
>>>
>>> Saya telah menerima surat daripada Dekan Fakulti
Syariah & Undang2 menyatakan fakulti kecewa

kerana saya enggan bekerjasama

“memanipulasi markah”
(my understanding,the exact wordings were
“melihat/menyemak semula secara menyeluruh
kaedah dan sistem penilaian yang dilakukan”.)
>>>
>>> Dekan juga menuduh saya tidak efficient dalam
pengajaran saya.
>>>
>>> Dato’, saya mohon bantuan pihak Dato’ kerana
saya dihukum kerana enggan memanipulasi

markah pelajar agar ramai lulus kerana ianya
tidak beretika. No telefon saya ialah xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Terima kasih.
>>>

>

My reply to Prof Ir Radin on June 11, 2008 8:08:25 AM

 

From: My real name & email address  

To: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:08:25 AM
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

terima kasih Dato’.

Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my> wrote:

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato’ Radin Umar
Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

Prof Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar’s Reply June 11, 2008

 

From: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
To: my real name & email address
Cc: mrujhan <mrujhan@mohe.gov.my>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:42:26 AM
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

Prof Rujhan akan menangani nya dengan berhemah.
________________________________
Professor Dato’ Radin Umar
Director General
Department of Higher Education
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
Level 3, Block E9, Parcel E
62505 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

My Email (11 June 2008) to Prof Dr Ir Radin Umar KP IPTA KPT

From: My real name & email address

 

To: Professor Dato’ Dr Ir Radin Umar <radinumx@mohe.gov.my>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:30:22 AM
Subject: Re: Dihukum tidak efficient kerana enggan manipulasi markah

 

Dato’
Sy mohon bantuan Dato’ kerana sy baru 6 bulan bekerja di sini dan sy memang tidak diperlakukan dengan adil meskipun saya berkata benar. Terima kasih atas nasihat Dato’.

World Class Higher Education in Malaysia: USIM Undergraduate 2

World Class Higher Education: USIM Undergraduate 2

 

What are the consequences of Talaq Ba’in Sughra.     

(6 marks)

 

Answer scheme

 

Dissolves a marriage instantly(1 mark)

at the time of  pronouncement(1 mark)

The rights of the wife cease as soon as the talaq is pronounced(1 mark)

If the ex-husband wishes to resume marital relationship with his ex-wife(1 mark)

he has to undergo a new marriage ceremony with her (1 mark)

with a new mas kahwin.(1 mark)

 

Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060554

 

The pronounce by the husband . If the husband want to ruju’ with his wife, the husband during the period eddah For waiting his wife and return. If the husband wisher to marriage his wife, a wife must must marriage with another man with inttension consummated. After his wife marriage with another man, the husband can marriage his wife or solemnization or ceremony of the marriage.

 

-three talaq by the husband for his wife.

[Marks earned: Zero Point three (0.3) out of Six (6)]

 

World Class Higher Education: USIM Undergraduate 1

World Class Higher Education: USIM Undergraduate 1

Give four (4) instances of Talaq Ba’in Sughra. (4 marks)

 Answer scheme

When the eddah period has expired (1 mark)

Talaq through fasakh (1 mark)

Talaq pronounced before the consummation of the marriage (1 mark)

Talaq through khulu’. (1 mark)

 Sample answer by USIM undergraduate 1060554

-must be pronounce with talaq 3 (reputiation) to his wife.

-the husband will be give the new “maskawin” to his wife.

-the wife will be marriage with another man before marriage ex-husband.

 -can solemnization or ceremony of the marriage, if he want.

[Marks earned: Zero (0) out of Four (4)]

World Class Higher Education: USIM LAW Undergraduate 10

World Class Higher Education: USIM LAW Undergraduate

1. Provide the origin and ratio decidendi of these cases:

ii. Mustapha v Habeeba (10 marks)

Answer Scheme

In the Negeri Sembilan case of Mustapha v Habeeba, (1 mark)

the learned kadi who heard the case held that three divorces had been effected (1 mark)

when the husband as alleged pronounced, ‘I divorce you. I divorce you. I divorce you’ to the wife. (1 mark)

The learned kadi did not call any witnesses to support the husband’s statement. (1 mark)

The Appeal Board ordered the case to be retried (1 mark)

as the case had not been heard and adjudged correctly, (1 mark)

because no witnesses had been called. (1 mark)

They held that the mere statement (iqrar) of the husband could not be accepted (1 mark)

as it was not conclusive (1 mark)

 and the circumstances and conditions of the making of the statement were not considered. (1 mark)

 Sample answer by USIM LAW undergraduate 1050613

Mustapha v Habeeba (1990) The husband was said “I divorce you. I divorce you. I divorce you” to his wife. The husband is Hanafi practicer and at the time the wife was pregnant. At the court, subordinate court effected for talaq. At Appeal court, the husband defend himself was at the time not in proper sense and induce by black magc. The Syariah Appeal Court held that the subordinate court did not called any witness. According to Hanafi practice, a divorce at same time and place was effected one talaq only.

The ratio decidendi is triple divorce at the same time and place was effected one talaq only.

Email to MQA today refuting its claim that it does not know my identity

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: nor benar <usimmmucheat@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:41 AM
Subject: Fwd: MQA lied when it said it does not know the identity of Ex-Usim lecturer
To: minister@mohe.gov.my

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: nor benar <usimmmucheat@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:31 AM
Subject: MQA lied when it said it does not know the identity of Ex-Usim lecturer
To: syedahmad@mqa.gov.my, muammar@mqa.gov.my
Cc: tam@bpa.jpm.my, letters@thesundaily.com, tanyl@thesundaily.com, tanyiliang@gmail.com, mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my

Assalamualaikum
 
I refute MQA’s claim in theSun at page 6 being reported on Tuesday April 21 2009 that it does not know my identity in an article “Probe into lecturer’s ’sympathy marks’ case”. I complained about Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia’s (USIM) unethical practice forcing me to manipulate marks to Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif of Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein on the 10th of June 2008 (10/6/2008). Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein called me and informed me that MQA can only investigate allegedly “unethical Public Universities” in January 2009.

This year, I sent an email to Ketua Pengarah Biro Pengaduan Awam Dr Tam Weng Wah regarding USIM’s unethical practice forcing me to manipulate marks whereby I explained to him that I gave extra classes to the students after they performed badly in the mid semester exam. Then Dr Tam forwarded my email to En Mohd Asri bin Mohamad (mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my) on Wednesday March 4 2009 at 7:55:39pm which states the following:
“KPP (A4), Disertakan maklumat tambahan untuk tindakan susulan. Sekian, terima kasih. KP” This email by Dr Tam was being cced (cc) to the aforementioned Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif MQA, Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein at syedahmad@mqa.gov.my.

Then on Thursday March 5 2009 at 1:01:05 PM En Mohd Asri bin Mohamad (mohdasri@bpa.jpm.my) sent an email to the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) which reads the following:
“Tuan, Dikemukakan bersama-sama ini email aduan daripada pengadu untuk mendapat makluman dan tindakan pihak tuan jua. Dipohon maklum balas daripada pihak tuan dikemukakan terus kepada pengadu dan sesalinan dipanjangkan kepada BPA untuk tujuan rekod.Di atas kerjasama dan tindakan segera di pihak tuan amatlah dihargai. Sekian, terima kasih.” This email by En Mohd Asri bin Mohamad was also being cced (cc) to the aforementioned Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif MQA, Dato’ Dr. Syed Ahmad Hussein at syedahmad@mqa.gov.my.

Based on the abovementioned explanation, I hereby rebut MQA’s spokesman Muhammad Muammar Gaddafi’s claim in theSun which reads “..we do not know who the teacher is”.

Please be informed. Thank You.